PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEVL.L vs. IEMA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IEVL.L vs. IEMA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (IEVL.L) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEMA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IEVL.L vs. IEMA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating
2.19%35.00%10.59%13.55%-3.79%26.68%-8.75%21.75%-13.48%10.41%
IEMA.L
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.21%18.46%14.71%6.15%-15.28%4.44%9.20%18.37%-9.91%19.48%
Different Trading Currencies

IEVL.L is traded in EUR, while IEMA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IEMA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IEVL.L having a 2.19% return and IEMA.L slightly higher at 2.21%. Over the past 10 years, IEVL.L has outperformed IEMA.L with an annualized return of 10.05%, while IEMA.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.61% annualized return.


IEVL.L

1D
0.56%
1M
-7.02%
YTD
2.19%
6M
13.36%
1Y
25.76%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
10.05%

IEMA.L

1D
-0.78%
1M
-9.74%
YTD
2.21%
6M
7.08%
1Y
22.50%
3Y*
12.78%
5Y*
3.88%
10Y*
7.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IEVL.L vs. IEMA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEVL.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMA.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

IEVL.L vs. IEMA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEVL.L
IEVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IEVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

IEMA.L
IEMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IEMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEVL.L vs. IEMA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (IEVL.L) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEMA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEVL.LIEMA.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.59

1.23

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.01

1.67

+0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.23

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

1.64

+0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.76

5.84

+1.93

IEVL.L vs. IEMA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEVL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the IEMA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEVL.L and IEMA.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEVL.LIEMA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.23

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.23

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.41

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.32

+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between IEVL.L and IEMA.L is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IEVL.L vs. IEMA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IEVL.L nor IEMA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

IEVL.L vs. IEMA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEVL.L drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, which is greater than IEMA.L's maximum drawdown of -35.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEVL.L and IEMA.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IEVL.LIEMA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.09%

-39.66%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.33%

-12.76%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.55%

-37.08%

+17.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.09%

-39.66%

-0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.18%

-12.67%

+5.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.60%

-15.43%

+7.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

3.55%

-0.37%

Volatility

IEVL.L vs. IEMA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (IEVL.L) is 6.41%, while iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEMA.L) has a volatility of 8.77%. This indicates that IEVL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IEVL.LIEMA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.41%

8.77%

-2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.55%

13.20%

-3.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.19%

18.26%

-2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.22%

16.67%

-1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

18.65%

-0.98%