PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEDMX vs. FKRCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEDMX vs. FKRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEDMX achieves a 44.70% return, which is significantly higher than FKRCX's 6.83% return. Over the past 10 years, TEDMX has underperformed FKRCX with an annualized return of 13.61%, while FKRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.96% annualized return.


TEDMX

1D
0.90%
1M
17.40%
YTD
44.70%
6M
48.60%
1Y
85.58%
3Y*
33.21%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*
13.61%

FKRCX

1D
1.17%
1M
2.22%
YTD
6.83%
6M
19.04%
1Y
85.44%
3Y*
53.81%
5Y*
21.74%
10Y*
15.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEDMX vs. FKRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEDMX
Templeton Developing Markets Trust
44.70%44.71%8.14%12.28%-22.17%-5.82%18.65%26.39%-16.21%40.21%
FKRCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund
6.83%196.59%17.64%2.03%-23.47%-4.03%44.30%51.48%-18.11%-0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between TEDMX and FKRCX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1992

0.36

The correlation between TEDMX and FKRCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEDMX vs. FKRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEDMX
TEDMX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
TEDMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEDMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEDMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
TEDMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEDMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FKRCX
FKRCX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FKRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FKRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEDMX vs. FKRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TEDMXFKRCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.34

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.78

2.82

+2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.57

7.91

+15.66

TEDMX vs. FKRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEDMX Sharpe Ratio is 4.22, which is higher than the FKRCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEDMX and FKRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEDMXFKRCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.22

2.09

+2.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.65

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.49

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.19

+0.24

Drawdowns

TEDMX vs. FKRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEDMX drawdown since its inception was -64.97%, smaller than the maximum FKRCX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEDMX and FKRCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEDMXFKRCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.97%

-78.85%

+13.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.80%

-31.15%

+16.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.80%

-31.15%

+16.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.15%

-48.79%

+6.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.36%

-49.54%

+5.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-20.60%

+20.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.45%

-33.74%

+14.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

11.07%

-7.45%

Volatility

TEDMX vs. FKRCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX) is 8.86%, while Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) has a volatility of 13.60%. This indicates that TEDMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEDMXFKRCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.86%

13.60%

-4.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.58%

35.14%

-17.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.29%

42.21%

-21.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.52%

33.82%

-14.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

32.85%

-13.73%

TEDMX vs. FKRCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEDMX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FKRCX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEDMX vs. FKRCX - Dividend Comparison

TEDMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than FKRCX's 10.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKRCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund
10.06%10.75%13.44%3.12%0.00%9.37%10.55%0.00%0.00%0.37%8.73%0.00%
TEDMX
Templeton Developing Markets Trust
1.83%2.64%3.30%3.44%5.25%6.76%2.40%4.54%1.35%0.90%1.20%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEDMX and FKRCX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKRCX has higher volatility (13.60%) compared to TEDMX (8.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEDMX dropped -64.97% vs FKRCX's -78.85%.

TEDMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.22 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEDMX and FKRCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer