TEDMX vs. FKINX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TEDMX (Templeton Developing Markets Trust) and FKINX (Franklin Income Fund Class A1) are both mutual funds - TEDMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while FKINX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, TEDMX returned 13.50%/yr vs 7.44%/yr for FKINX. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TEDMX charges 1.38%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for FKINX.

Performance

TEDMX vs. FKINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX) and Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEDMX achieves a 43.38% return, which is significantly higher than FKINX's 4.75% return. Over the past 10 years, TEDMX has outperformed FKINX with an annualized return of 13.50%, while FKINX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.44% annualized return.

TEDMX

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: 14.19%
• YTD: 43.38%
• 6M: 47.35%
• 1Y: 81.31%
• 3Y*: 32.80%
• 5Y*: 10.96%
• 10Y*: 13.50%

FKINX

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 4.75%
• 6M: 5.17%
• 1Y: 13.85%
• 3Y*: 10.15%
• 5Y*: 6.16%
• 10Y*: 7.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEDMX vs. FKINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TEDMX Templeton Developing Markets Trust	43.38%	44.71%	8.14%	12.28%	-22.17%	-5.82%	18.65%	26.39%	-16.21%	40.21%
FKINX Franklin Income Fund Class A1	4.75%	12.24%	7.12%	8.65%	-5.29%	17.21%	3.57%	15.75%	-5.54%	8.43%

Correlation

The correlation between TEDMX and FKINX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1992	0.47

The correlation between TEDMX and FKINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.53 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TEDMX vs. FKINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEDMX

TEDMX Risk / Return Rank: 95
TEDMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
TEDMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
TEDMX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
TEDMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
TEDMX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

FKINX

FKINX Risk / Return Rank: 84
FKINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FKINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FKINX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FKINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FKINX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEDMX vs. FKINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX) and Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TEDMX	FKINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.16	2.65	+1.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.86	3.96	+0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.75	1.57	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.70	4.20	+1.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.22	17.06	+6.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TEDMX vs. FKINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEDMX Sharpe Ratio is 4.16, which is higher than the FKINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEDMX and FKINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TEDMX	FKINX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.16	2.65	+1.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.78	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	0.80	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.90	-0.48

Drawdowns

TEDMX vs. FKINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEDMX drawdown since its inception was -64.97%, which is greater than FKINX's maximum drawdown of -43.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEDMX and FKINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEDMX	FKINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.97%	-43.18%	-21.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.80%	-3.43%	-11.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.80%	-7.42%	-7.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.15%	-13.20%	-28.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.36%	-23.91%	-20.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.91%	-0.39%	-0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.45%	-3.71%	-15.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.62%	0.84%	+2.78%

Volatility

TEDMX vs. FKINX - Volatility Comparison

Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX) has a higher volatility of 8.97% compared to Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX) at 1.20%. This indicates that TEDMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TEDMX	FKINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.97%	1.20%	+7.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.62%	3.80%	+13.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.30%	5.42%	+14.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.52%	7.91%	+11.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.11%	9.27%	+9.84%

TEDMX vs. FKINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEDMX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FKINX's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEDMX vs. FKINX - Dividend Comparison

TEDMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than FKINX's 5.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FKINX Franklin Income Fund Class A1	5.55%	5.58%	5.59%	5.52%	5.22%	6.52%	5.22%	5.11%	5.34%	5.04%	5.19%	5.71%
TEDMX Templeton Developing Markets Trust	1.84%	2.64%	3.30%	3.44%	5.25%	6.76%	2.40%	4.54%	1.35%	0.90%	1.20%	1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEDMX and FKINX in my portfolio?

TEDMX and FKINX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TEDMX or FKINX?

TEDMX has higher volatility (8.97%) compared to FKINX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEDMX dropped -64.97% vs FKINX's -43.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TEDMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.16 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.