PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEDIX vs. CSUAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEDIX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund Class A (TEDIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEDIX achieves a 7.21% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 12.09% return. Over the past 10 years, TEDIX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 8.92%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.22% annualized return.


TEDIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
3.63%
6M
3.59%
YTD
7.21%
1Y
19.80%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
8.92%
ALL TIME*
9.29%

CSUAX

1D
-0.30%
1M
-0.23%
6M
8.33%
YTD
12.09%
1Y
17.26%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*
7.22%
ALL TIME*
9.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TEDIX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEDIX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund Class A
7.21%23.45%6.16%20.16%-4.98%19.33%-4.62%24.41%-11.07%7.16%
CSUAX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A
12.09%14.30%8.30%2.09%-5.20%16.24%-1.65%24.26%-5.83%17.99%

Correlation

The correlation between TEDIX and CSUAX is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2004

0.66

The correlation between TEDIX and CSUAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEDIX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TEDIX
TEDIX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
TEDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
TEDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

CSUAX
CSUAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CSUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CSUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TEDIX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund Class A (TEDIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TEDIXCSUAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

3.01

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.44

9.45

-4.01

TEDIX vs. CSUAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEDIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the CSUAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEDIX and CSUAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TEDIX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEDIX drawdown since its inception was -40.21%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEDIX and CSUAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEDIXCSUAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.21%

-52.20%

+11.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.10%

-5.99%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-11.83%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.69%

-20.45%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.21%

-35.05%

-5.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-1.95%

+1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.91%

-8.39%

+2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

1.90%

+1.57%

Volatility

TEDIX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund Class A (TEDIX) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 2.93%. This indicates that TEDIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEDIXCSUAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

2.93%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.40%

8.16%

+1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

10.13%

+1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.67%

13.00%

+2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

14.88%

+2.14%

TEDIX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEDIX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEDIX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison

TEDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.99%, more than CSUAX's 7.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSUAX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A
7.63%8.09%2.23%2.17%3.55%2.95%1.30%1.52%2.08%5.00%2.04%6.20%
TEDIX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund Class A
9.99%10.71%12.98%7.09%10.31%8.70%3.33%7.11%7.35%3.03%4.20%7.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEDIX and CSUAX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEDIX has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to CSUAX (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEDIX dropped -40.21% vs CSUAX's -52.20%.

CSUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEDIX and CSUAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer