TECS vs. TERG
TECS (Direxion Daily Technology Bear 3X Shares) and TERG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. TECS is passively managed, while TERG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.61, they often move in opposite directions. TECS charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TERG.
Performance
TECS vs. TERG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TECS achieves a -64.31% return, which is significantly lower than TERG's 229.64% return.
TECS
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -45.32%
- YTD
- -64.31%
- 6M
- -63.84%
- 1Y
- -80.92%
- 3Y*
- -64.76%
- 5Y*
- -59.06%
- 10Y*
- -62.51%
TERG
- 1D
- 8.49%
- 1M
- 39.95%
- YTD
- 229.64%
- 6M
- 218.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TECS vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TECS Direxion Daily Technology Bear 3X Shares | -64.31% | -5.90% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 229.64% | 28.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between TECS and TERG is -0.61, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TECS vs. TERG — Risk / Return Rank
TECS
TERG
TECS vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Technology Bear 3X Shares (TECS) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TECS | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.68 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.81 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TECS | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.89 | 9.90 | -10.79 |
Drawdowns
TECS vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TECS drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than TERG's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECS and TERG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TECS | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -49.52% | -50.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -81.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -100.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -15.98% | -84.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -96.76% | -13.73% | -83.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.66% | — | — |
Volatility
TECS vs. TERG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TECS | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.52% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.27% | 139.25% | -76.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.25% | 139.25% | -65.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.17% | 139.25% | -67.08% |
TECS vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TECS has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TECS vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison
TECS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.91%, while TERG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TECS Direxion Daily Technology Bear 3X Shares | 10.91% | 5.83% | 5.24% | 7.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.50% | 2.40% | 0.72% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TECS and TERG have a correlation of -0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for TECS.
TECS has the higher dividend yield at 10.91%, compared with 0.00% for TERG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for TECS and 0.75% for TERG.
Find the right allocation for TECS and TERG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer