PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TECL vs. TNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TECL vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TECL achieves a 125.87% return, which is significantly higher than TNA's 46.53% return. Over the past 10 years, TECL has outperformed TNA with an annualized return of 54.49%, while TNA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.85% annualized return.


TECL

1D
-2.99%
1M
73.10%
YTD
125.87%
6M
118.69%
1Y
267.85%
3Y*
80.64%
5Y*
43.44%
10Y*
54.49%

TNA

1D
-4.11%
1M
9.08%
YTD
46.53%
6M
40.42%
1Y
118.36%
3Y*
28.02%
5Y*
-6.21%
10Y*
7.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TECL vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
125.87%38.60%36.15%203.14%-74.32%112.80%69.46%185.58%-24.03%124.82%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
46.53%9.82%7.21%26.24%-62.48%27.88%-7.82%71.88%-39.89%39.15%

Correlation

The correlation between TECL and TNA is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2008

0.72

The correlation between TECL and TNA shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TECL vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TECL
TNA

Technology

20.4%
16.9%

Energy

0.0%
6.2%

Industrials

0.0%
17.5%

Basic Materials

-

4.8%

Communication Services

-

2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.4%

Financial Services

-

15.9%

Healthcare

-

16.5%

Real Estate

-

6.2%

Utilities

-

2.9%

Technology

TECL
20.4%
TNA
16.9%

Energy

TECL
0.0%
TNA
6.2%

Industrials

TECL
0.0%
TNA
17.5%

Basic Materials

TECL

-

TNA
4.8%

Communication Services

TECL

-

TNA
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

TECL

-

TNA
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

TECL

-

TNA
2.4%

Financial Services

TECL

-

TNA
15.9%

Healthcare

TECL

-

TNA
16.5%

Real Estate

TECL

-

TNA
6.2%

Utilities

TECL

-

TNA
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TECL vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TECL
TECL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
TECL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TECL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
TECL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TECL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
TECL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

TNA
TNA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TECL vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TECLTNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.30

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.79

3.66

+2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.63

12.05

+4.59

TECL vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TECL Sharpe Ratio is 4.35, which is higher than the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TECL and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TECLTNADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.35

2.09

+2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

-0.09

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.12

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.23

+0.54

Drawdowns

TECL vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TECL drawdown since its inception was -77.96%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECL and TNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TECLTNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.96%

-88.09%

+10.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.58%

-32.53%

-14.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.58%

-65.78%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.96%

-82.36%

+4.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.96%

-88.09%

+10.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.99%

-38.03%

+35.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-33.90%

+15.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.19%

9.86%

+6.33%

Volatility

TECL vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) has a higher volatility of 20.70% compared to Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) at 17.14%. This indicates that TECL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TECLTNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.70%

17.14%

+3.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.83%

40.25%

+9.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.17%

57.08%

+5.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.09%

67.31%

+6.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.35%

68.42%

+3.93%

TECL vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TECL has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

TECL vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

TECL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than TNA's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
3.15%7.19%0.29%0.28%0.22%0.32%0.52%0.25%0.47%0.10%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.41%0.78%0.93%1.27%0.31%0.06%0.03%0.44%0.36%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


TECL and TNA have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TECL has higher volatility (20.70%) compared to TNA (17.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TECL dropped -77.96% vs TNA's -88.09%.

On 10-year performance, TECL leads with 54.49% vs 7.85% for TNA. On fees, TECL is cheaper at 0.91% per year. On volatility, TNA has been the lower-risk option at 17.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TECL has performed better with a 54.49% return vs 7.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TECL is cheaper with a 0.91% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for TNA.

TECL has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 0.41% for TNA.

TECL tracks Technology Select Sector Index (300%), while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.91% for TECL and 1.14% for TNA.

TECL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TECL and TNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer