PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TECL vs. TNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TECL vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TECL achieves a 77.71% return, which is significantly higher than TNA's 64.90% return. Over the past 10 years, TECL has outperformed TNA with an annualized return of 47.77%, while TNA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.49% annualized return.


TECL

1D
14.98%
1M
6.72%
6M
88.27%
YTD
77.71%
1Y
117.04%
3Y*
64.24%
5Y*
28.73%
10Y*
47.77%
ALL TIME*
48.13%

TNA

1D
5.58%
1M
2.90%
6M
37.84%
YTD
64.90%
1Y
117.06%
3Y*
25.74%
5Y*
-2.27%
10Y*
7.49%
ALL TIME*
14.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$156.89M$152.83M$226.69M
$305.05M$300.12M$407.55M

TECL vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
77.71%38.60%36.15%203.14%-74.32%112.80%69.46%185.58%-24.03%124.82%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
64.90%9.82%7.21%26.24%-62.48%27.88%-7.82%71.88%-39.89%39.15%

Correlation

The correlation between TECL and TNA is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2008

0.72

The correlation between TECL and TNA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

TECL vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TECL
TNA

Technology

99.2%
14.8%

Communication Services

0.8%
2.2%

Energy

0.0%
5.5%

Industrials

0.0%
14.2%

Basic Materials

-

4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.6%

Financial Services

-

17.5%

Healthcare

-

20.3%

Real Estate

-

6.6%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Technology

TECL
99.2%
TNA
14.8%

Communication Services

TECL
0.8%
TNA
2.2%

Energy

TECL
0.0%
TNA
5.5%

Industrials

TECL
0.0%
TNA
14.2%

Basic Materials

TECL

-

TNA
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

TECL

-

TNA
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

TECL

-

TNA
2.6%

Financial Services

TECL

-

TNA
17.5%

Healthcare

TECL

-

TNA
20.3%

Real Estate

TECL

-

TNA
6.6%

Utilities

TECL

-

TNA
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TECL vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TECL
TECL Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
TECL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TECL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
TECL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TECL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TECL Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

TNA
TNA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TECL vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TECLTNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.30

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

3.62

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.97

11.88

-5.91

TECL vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TECL Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TECL and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TECL vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TECL drawdown since its inception was -77.96%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECL and TNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TECLTNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.96%

-88.09%

+10.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.58%

-32.53%

-14.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.58%

-65.78%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.96%

-82.36%

+4.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.96%

-88.09%

+10.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.68%

-30.26%

+6.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.45%

-33.92%

+15.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.69%

9.89%

+9.80%

Volatility

TECL vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) has a higher volatility of 30.57% compared to Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) at 13.59%. This indicates that TECL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TECLTNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.57%

13.59%

+16.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

66.53%

42.37%

+24.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.41%

57.82%

+19.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

76.96%

67.27%

+9.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.75%

68.39%

+5.36%

TECL vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TECL has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

TECL vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

TECL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than TNA's 0.28% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
4.01%7.19%0.29%0.28%0.22%0.32%0.52%0.25%0.47%0.10%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.28%0.78%0.93%1.27%0.31%0.06%0.03%0.44%0.36%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


TECL and TNA have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TECL has higher volatility (30.57%) compared to TNA (13.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TECL dropped -77.96% vs TNA's -88.09%.

On 10-year performance, TECL leads with 47.77% vs 7.49% for TNA. On fees, TECL is cheaper at 0.91% per year. On volatility, TNA has been the lower-risk option at 13.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TECL has performed better with a 47.77% return vs 7.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TECL is cheaper with a 0.91% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TNA.

TECL has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 0.28% for TNA.

TECL tracks Technology Select Sector Index (300%), while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). Their fees differ too: 0.91% for TECL and 1.05% for TNA.

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TECL and TNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer