TECB vs. IWM
TECB (iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TECB is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NYSE FactSet U.S. Tech Breakthrough Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TECB returned 14.60%/yr vs 6.11%/yr for IWM. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TECB charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
TECB vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TECB achieves a 19.78% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 17.07% return.
TECB
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 12.64%
- YTD
- 19.78%
- 6M
- 18.27%
- 1Y
- 34.41%
- 3Y*
- 26.35%
- 5Y*
- 14.60%
- 10Y*
- —
IWM
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 17.07%
- 6M
- 15.83%
- 1Y
- 39.10%
- 3Y*
- 17.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.11%
- 10Y*
- 10.93%
TECB vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TECB iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF | 19.78% | 14.86% | 24.38% | 57.53% | -34.39% | 19.60% | 39.90% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 17.07% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between TECB and IWM is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2020 | 0.71 |
The correlation between TECB and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
TECB vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TECB
IWM
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Technology
TECB
IWM
Healthcare
TECB
IWM
Communication Services
TECB
IWM
Financial Services
TECB
IWM
Consumer Cyclical
TECB
IWM
Real Estate
TECB
IWM
Industrials
TECB
IWM
Energy
TECB
IWM
Basic Materials
TECB
-
IWM
Consumer Defensive
TECB
-
IWM
Utilities
TECB
-
IWM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TECB vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
TECB
IWM
TECB vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF (TECB) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TECB | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.34 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 3.56 | -1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.24 | 12.64 | -6.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TECB | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 2.05 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.27 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.37 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
TECB vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TECB drawdown since its inception was -41.62%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECB and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TECB | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.62% | -59.05% | +17.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.24% | -11.03% | -5.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.91% | -27.50% | +3.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.62% | -31.91% | -9.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.70% | -1.49% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.18% | -10.77% | +0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 3.10% | +2.43% |
Volatility
TECB vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF (TECB) is 5.28%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that TECB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TECB | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.28% | 5.75% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.17% | 13.53% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.05% | 19.20% | -2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.51% | 22.52% | +0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.37% | 23.04% | +2.33% |
TECB vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TECB has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
TECB vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
TECB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than IWM's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.88% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
TECB iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF | 0.28% | 0.33% | 0.35% | 0.23% | 0.61% | 0.35% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TECB and IWM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWM has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to TECB (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TECB dropped -41.62% vs IWM's -59.05%.
On 5-year performance, TECB leads with 14.60% vs 6.11% for IWM. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, TECB has been the lower-risk option at 5.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TECB has performed better with a 14.60% return vs 6.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TECB.
IWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.28% for TECB.
TECB is categorized as Technology Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. TECB tracks NYSE FactSet U.S. Tech Breakthrough Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TECB and 0.19% for IWM.
IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TECB and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer