PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TECB vs. EINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TECB vs. EINC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TECB (iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TECB is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NYSE FactSet U.S. Tech Breakthrough Index, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TECB returned 12.38%/yr vs 21.18%/yr for EINC. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TECB charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

TECB vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF (TECB) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TECB achieves a 14.50% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 25.97% return.

TECB

1D
-1.74%
1M
-1.20%
YTD
14.50%
6M
13.00%
1Y
26.24%
3Y*
23.75%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*
—

EINC

1D
1.37%
1M
-4.50%
YTD
25.97%
6M
25.98%
1Y
29.82%
3Y*
30.36%
5Y*
21.18%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TECB vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TECB
iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF		14.50%14.86%24.38%57.53%-34.39%19.60%39.90%
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		25.97%7.11%42.79%15.55%19.18%38.05%-21.48%

Correlation

The correlation between TECB and EINC is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2020

0.28

The correlation between TECB and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TECB vs. EINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
TECB
EINC

Technology

64.3%

-

Communication Services

10.8%

-

Healthcare

10.8%

-

Financial Services

5.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%

-

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Industrials

0.8%
2.5%

Energy

0.6%
99.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Utilities

-

0.6%

Technology

TECB
64.3%
EINC

-

Communication Services

TECB
10.8%
EINC

-

Healthcare

TECB
10.8%
EINC

-

Financial Services

TECB
5.6%
EINC

-

Consumer Cyclical

TECB
5.4%
EINC

-

Real Estate

TECB
1.7%
EINC

-

Industrials

TECB
0.8%
EINC
2.5%

Energy

TECB
0.6%
EINC
99.4%

Basic Materials

TECB

-

EINC

-

Consumer Defensive

TECB

-

EINC

-

Utilities

TECB

-

EINC
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF

VanEck Energy Income ETF

Often compared with TECB:
TECB vs. AIQTECB vs. BTEKTECB vs. QQQMTECB vs. VGTTECB vs. IETCTECB vs. XLKTECB vs. ARKK
Often compared with EINC:
EINC vs. XLEEINC vs. BIZDEINC vs. EMLPEINC vs. SMHEINC vs. IXCEINC vs. VPUEINC vs. ERY

Return for Risk

TECB vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TECB
TECB Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
TECB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TECB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
TECB Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TECB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
TECB Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
EINC
EINC Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TECB vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF (TECB) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

TECBEINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.44
1.99

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.99
2.67

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.35

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

3.80

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.64

9.63

-4.99

TECB vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TECB Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TECB and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TECB vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TECB drawdown since its inception was -41.62%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECB and EINC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TECBEINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.62%

-87.55%

+45.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.24%

-7.89%

-8.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.91%

-16.01%

-7.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.62%

-19.87%

-21.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-68.85%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.03%

-4.50%

-1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.14%

-44.15%

+34.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.67%

3.10%

+2.57%

Volatility

TECB vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF (TECB) has a higher volatility of 8.36% compared to VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) at 6.51%. This indicates that TECB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TECBEINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.36%

6.51%

+1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.80%

11.88%

+2.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.34%

15.10%

+3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.70%

19.54%

+4.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.43%

25.43%

0.00%

TECB vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TECB has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

TECB vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

TECB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than EINC's 3.51% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		3.51%4.51%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%
TECB
iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF		0.31%0.33%0.35%0.23%0.61%0.35%0.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

TECB and EINC have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TECB has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to EINC (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TECB dropped -41.62% vs EINC's -87.55%.

On 5-year performance, EINC leads with 21.18% vs 12.38% for TECB. On fees, TECB is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 6.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EINC has performed better with a 21.18% return vs 12.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TECB is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EINC.

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 0.31% for TECB.

TECB is categorized as Technology Equities, while EINC is Energy Equities. TECB tracks NYSE FactSet U.S. Tech Breakthrough Index, while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TECB and 0.45% for EINC.

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TECB and EINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer