TEC vs. BPH

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

TEC (Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEC is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Harbor, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. Their -0.17 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TEC charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

TEC vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF (TEC) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TEC

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: -1.99%
• 6M: 14.71%
• YTD: 12.93%
• 1Y: 27.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 46.08%

BPH

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: 18.84%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	$53.46K	$52.99K	$51.54K
TEC Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF	$6.58K	$8.72K	$15.46K

TEC vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TEC Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF	-0.95%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	5.67%

Correlation

The correlation between TEC and BPH is -0.17, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	-0.17

TEC vs. BPH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TEC	BPH
Technology	72.0%	-
Communication Services	11.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	-
Healthcare	3.8%	-
Industrials	2.3%	-
Utilities	1.1%	-
Financial Services	0.9%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

TEC vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TEC

TEC Risk / Return Rank: 39
TEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
TEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
TEC Omega Ratio Rank: 39
TEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
TEC Martin Ratio Rank: 37

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TEC vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF (TEC) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TEC	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.92	—	—

Drawdowns

TEC vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEC drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEC and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEC	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.50%	-15.58%	-1.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.37%	0.00%	-7.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.76%	-5.64%	+1.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.16%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TEC	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.16%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.75%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.16%	28.58%	-5.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.53%	28.58%	-6.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.53%	28.58%	-6.05%

TEC vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEC vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

TEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.

Position	TTM
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.48%
TEC Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEC and BPH in my portfolio?

TEC and BPH have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TEC or BPH?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TEC or BPH?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TEC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TEC or BPH?

BPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.00% for TEC.

What is the main difference between TEC and BPH?

TEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TEC and 0.19% for BPH.