TEC vs. BPH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TEC (Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEC is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Harbor, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. TEC charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

TEC vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF (TEC) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TEC

• 1D: -2.94%
• 1M: -0.28%
• YTD: 13.69%
• 6M: 12.37%
• 1Y: 33.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BPH

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEC vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TEC Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF	-0.28%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between TEC and BPH is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	-0.07

TEC vs. BPH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TEC	BPH
Technology	72.3%	-
Communication Services	12.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	-
Healthcare	3.3%	-
Utilities	1.2%	-
Financial Services	0.9%	-
Industrials	0.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

TEC vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEC

TEC Risk / Return Rank: 44
TEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
TEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
TEC Omega Ratio Rank: 45
TEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
TEC Martin Ratio Rank: 40

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEC vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF (TEC) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TEC	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.84	—	—

Drawdowns

TEC vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEC drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -9.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEC and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEC	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.50%	-9.43%	-8.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.74%	-8.71%	+1.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.54%	-3.18%	-0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.77%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TEC	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.60%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.19%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.68%	24.10%	-2.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.97%	24.10%	-2.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.97%	24.10%	-2.13%

TEC vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEC vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

TEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.

Position	TTM
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.53%
TEC Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEC and BPH in my portfolio?

TEC and BPH have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TEC or BPH?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TEC or BPH?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TEC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TEC or BPH?

BPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for TEC.

What is the main difference between TEC and BPH?

TEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TEC and 0.19% for BPH.