TEBRX vs. COTZX
Compare and contrast key facts about Teberg Fund (TEBRX) and Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX).
TEBRX is managed by Teberg. It was launched on Mar 31, 2002. COTZX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Sep 24, 2002.
Performance
TEBRX vs. COTZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TEBRX vs. COTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEBRX Teberg Fund | -0.87% | 18.67% | 20.76% | 34.92% | -22.47% | 25.02% | 20.61% | 26.55% | -6.70% | 15.25% |
COTZX Columbia Thermostat Fund | -1.58% | 15.02% | 7.98% | 11.66% | -12.92% | 6.44% | 29.61% | 15.15% | -1.17% | 3.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEBRX achieves a -0.87% return, which is significantly higher than COTZX's -1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, TEBRX has outperformed COTZX with an annualized return of 12.42%, while COTZX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.08% annualized return.
TEBRX
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- -4.87%
- YTD
- -0.87%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 23.06%
- 3Y*
- 19.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
COTZX
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- -1.58%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 12.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.35%
- 5Y*
- 4.20%
- 10Y*
- 7.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TEBRX vs. COTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEBRX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than COTZX's 0.24% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TEBRX vs. COTZX — Risk / Return Rank
TEBRX
COTZX
TEBRX vs. COTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teberg Fund (TEBRX) and Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEBRX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 1.49 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.75 | 2.39 | -0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.37 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 2.41 | -0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.82 | 12.35 | -3.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEBRX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 1.49 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.58 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.96 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.63 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between TEBRX and COTZX is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TEBRX vs. COTZX - Dividend Comparison
TEBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than COTZX's 3.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEBRX Teberg Fund | 0.12% | 0.12% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.60% | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 10.62% |
COTZX Columbia Thermostat Fund | 3.42% | 3.37% | 3.55% | 2.74% | 3.28% | 14.82% | 6.92% | 5.57% | 4.45% | 3.13% | 2.66% | 4.26% |
Drawdowns
TEBRX vs. COTZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEBRX drawdown since its inception was -39.10%, smaller than the maximum COTZX drawdown of -47.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEBRX and COTZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEBRX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.10% | -47.48% | +8.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.04% | -5.40% | -5.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.35% | -17.80% | -12.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.22% | -17.80% | -14.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.91% | -2.62% | -4.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.78% | -3.49% | -2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 1.05% | +1.64% |
Volatility
TEBRX vs. COTZX - Volatility Comparison
Teberg Fund (TEBRX) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX) at 2.55%. This indicates that TEBRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TEBRX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.58% | 2.55% | +4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.59% | 3.61% | +8.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.87% | 8.58% | +11.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 7.30% | +12.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.59% | 7.36% | +11.23% |