PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEBRX vs. GPIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEBRX vs. GPIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teberg Fund (TEBRX) and GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund (GPIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEBRX achieves a 21.81% return, which is significantly higher than GPIFX's 1.86% return. Over the past 10 years, TEBRX has outperformed GPIFX with an annualized return of 14.56%, while GPIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.58% annualized return.


TEBRX

1D
3.12%
1M
-3.79%
6M
16.59%
YTD
21.81%
1Y
36.73%
3Y*
22.63%
5Y*
14.46%
10Y*
14.56%
ALL TIME*
8.32%

GPIFX

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.34%
6M
1.63%
YTD
1.86%
1Y
4.86%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
0.06%
10Y*
2.58%
ALL TIME*
2.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TEBRX vs. GPIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEBRX
Teberg Fund
21.81%18.67%20.76%34.92%-22.47%25.02%20.61%26.55%-6.70%15.25%
GPIFX
GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund
1.86%3.69%4.22%7.13%-14.14%1.17%15.17%6.64%-2.48%6.83%

Correlation

The correlation between TEBRX and GPIFX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.36

Over the past year, TEBRX and GPIFX have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.36, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEBRX vs. GPIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TEBRX
TEBRX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
TEBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TEBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

GPIFX
GPIFX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GPIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TEBRX vs. GPIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teberg Fund (TEBRX) and GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund (GPIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TEBRXGPIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.43

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

3.03

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.13

13.19

-2.06

TEBRX vs. GPIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEBRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the GPIFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEBRX and GPIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TEBRX vs. GPIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEBRX drawdown since its inception was -39.10%, which is greater than GPIFX's maximum drawdown of -16.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEBRX and GPIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEBRXGPIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.10%

-16.72%

-22.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.15%

-1.69%

-9.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.50%

-4.14%

-14.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.35%

-16.72%

-13.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.22%

-16.72%

-15.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.39%

-0.53%

-7.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-3.99%

-1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

0.39%

+2.65%

Volatility

TEBRX vs. GPIFX - Volatility Comparison

Teberg Fund (TEBRX) has a higher volatility of 6.87% compared to GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund (GPIFX) at 0.63%. This indicates that TEBRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEBRXGPIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.87%

0.63%

+6.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.97%

2.13%

+14.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.82%

2.54%

+17.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.63%

4.80%

+15.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

5.32%

+13.79%

TEBRX vs. GPIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEBRX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIFX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEBRX vs. GPIFX - Dividend Comparison

TEBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than GPIFX's 4.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPIFX
GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund
4.90%5.15%5.18%4.86%1.96%3.10%2.62%3.73%3.46%3.90%1.97%1.24%
TEBRX
Teberg Fund
0.10%0.12%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.47%0.60%0.77%0.92%0.00%10.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEBRX and GPIFX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEBRX has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to GPIFX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEBRX dropped -39.10% vs GPIFX's -16.72%.

GPIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEBRX and GPIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer