PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEBRX vs. GPIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEBRX vs. GPIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teberg Fund (TEBRX) and GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund (GPIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEBRX achieves a 26.95% return, which is significantly higher than GPIFX's 2.09% return. Over the past 10 years, TEBRX has outperformed GPIFX with an annualized return of 14.96%, while GPIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.77% annualized return.


TEBRX

1D
0.49%
1M
10.09%
YTD
26.95%
6M
26.93%
1Y
50.40%
3Y*
27.57%
5Y*
15.88%
10Y*
14.96%

GPIFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.45%
YTD
2.09%
6M
2.40%
1Y
6.63%
3Y*
4.77%
5Y*
0.43%
10Y*
2.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEBRX vs. GPIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEBRX
Teberg Fund
26.95%18.67%20.76%34.92%-22.47%25.02%20.61%26.55%-6.70%15.25%
GPIFX
GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund
2.09%3.69%4.22%7.13%-14.14%1.17%15.17%6.64%-2.48%6.83%

Correlation

The correlation between TEBRX and GPIFX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.35

Over the past year, TEBRX and GPIFX have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEBRX vs. GPIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEBRX
TEBRX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TEBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
TEBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

GPIFX
GPIFX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GPIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEBRX vs. GPIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teberg Fund (TEBRX) and GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund (GPIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TEBRXGPIFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.26

2.77

+0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.23

4.06

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.62

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.06

3.99

+1.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.48

18.26

+4.22

TEBRX vs. GPIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEBRX Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is comparable to the GPIFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEBRX and GPIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEBRXGPIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26

2.77

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.09

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.52

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.47

+0.11

Drawdowns

TEBRX vs. GPIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEBRX drawdown since its inception was -39.10%, which is greater than GPIFX's maximum drawdown of -16.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEBRX and GPIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEBRXGPIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.10%

-16.72%

-22.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.95%

-1.69%

-8.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.50%

-4.14%

-14.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.35%

-16.72%

-13.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.22%

-16.72%

-15.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.31%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-4.03%

-1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

0.37%

+1.87%

Volatility

TEBRX vs. GPIFX - Volatility Comparison

Teberg Fund (TEBRX) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund (GPIFX) at 0.77%. This indicates that TEBRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEBRXGPIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

0.77%

+5.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.60%

1.96%

+10.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.83%

2.41%

+13.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.97%

4.79%

+15.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.75%

5.32%

+13.43%

TEBRX vs. GPIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEBRX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIFX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEBRX vs. GPIFX - Dividend Comparison

TEBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than GPIFX's 4.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPIFX
GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund
4.57%5.15%5.18%4.86%1.96%3.10%2.62%3.73%3.46%3.90%1.97%1.24%
TEBRX
Teberg Fund
0.09%0.12%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.47%0.60%0.77%0.92%0.00%10.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEBRX and GPIFX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEBRX has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to GPIFX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEBRX dropped -39.10% vs GPIFX's -16.72%.

TEBRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 2.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEBRX and GPIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer