TDUP vs. LQDA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ThredUp Inc. (TDUP) and Liquidia Corporation (LQDA).

Performance

TDUP vs. LQDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ThredUp Inc. (TDUP) and Liquidia Corporation (LQDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TDUP vs. LQDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TDUP ThredUp Inc.	-48.67%	359.71%	-38.22%	71.76%	-89.73%	-36.20%
LQDA Liquidia Corporation	9.42%	193.28%	-2.24%	88.85%	30.80%	92.49%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TDUP : $412.54M LQDA : $3.78B
EPS TDUP : -$0.16 LQDA : -$0.76
PS Ratio TDUP : 1.30 LQDA : 21.61
PB Ratio TDUP : 6.97 LQDA : 84.38
Total Revenue (TTM) TDUP : $310.81M LQDA : $158.32M
Gross Profit (TTM) TDUP : $246.75M LQDA : $153.90M
EBITDA (TTM) TDUP : -$8.00M LQDA : -$45.21M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDUP achieves a -48.67% return, which is significantly lower than LQDA's 9.42% return.

TDUP

• 1D: 5.47%
• 1M: -32.79%
• YTD: -48.67%
• 6M: -65.29%
• 1Y: 36.10%
• 3Y*: 9.04%
• 5Y*: -32.82%
• 10Y*: —

LQDA

• 1D: 7.28%
• 1M: 21.66%
• YTD: 9.42%
• 6M: 65.96%
• 1Y: 155.86%
• 3Y*: 76.11%
• 5Y*: 68.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TDUP vs. LQDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDUP

TDUP Risk / Return Rank: 57
TDUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
TDUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
TDUP Omega Ratio Rank: 62
TDUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
TDUP Martin Ratio Rank: 51

LQDA

LQDA Risk / Return Rank: 89
LQDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
LQDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
LQDA Omega Ratio Rank: 86
LQDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
LQDA Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDUP vs. LQDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ThredUp Inc. (TDUP) and Liquidia Corporation (LQDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TDUP	LQDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	2.28	-1.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	2.76	-1.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.34	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.36	3.97	-3.61
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.75	9.04	-8.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TDUP vs. LQDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDUP Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the LQDA Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDUP and LQDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TDUP	LQDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44	2.28	-1.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.31	0.95	-1.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.28	0.20	-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between TDUP and LQDA is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TDUP vs. LQDA - Dividend Comparison

Neither TDUP nor LQDA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

TDUP vs. LQDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDUP drawdown since its inception was -98.32%, roughly equal to the maximum LQDA drawdown of -93.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDUP and LQDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	TDUP	LQDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.32%	-93.87%	-4.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.25%	-37.82%	-36.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-98.21%	-55.36%	-42.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.55%	-19.06%	-70.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-79.45%	-71.10%	-8.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	35.59%	16.61%	+18.98%

Volatility

TDUP vs. LQDA - Volatility Comparison

ThredUp Inc. (TDUP) has a higher volatility of 31.42% compared to Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) at 16.81%. This indicates that TDUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TDUP	LQDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.42%	16.81%	+14.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.60%	44.56%	+5.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	82.56%	68.87%	+13.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	105.14%	72.66%	+32.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	108.92%	85.89%	+23.03%

Financials