PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDTF vs. PBTP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDTF vs. PBTP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDTF achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than PBTP's 2.15% return.


TDTF

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.44%
YTD
1.52%
6M
1.18%
1Y
5.07%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
1.72%
10Y*
2.93%

PBTP

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.08%
YTD
2.15%
6M
2.14%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDTF vs. PBTP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDTF
FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
1.52%7.83%2.40%4.10%-9.73%5.54%9.98%7.99%-0.82%0.33%
PBTP
Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF
2.15%5.98%4.72%4.53%-3.02%5.51%4.89%4.72%0.59%0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between TDTF and PBTP is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2017

0.78

The correlation between TDTF and PBTP shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDTF vs. PBTP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDTF
TDTF Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
TDTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDTF Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
TDTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDTF Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

PBTP
PBTP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PBTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBTP Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PBTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBTP Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDTF vs. PBTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDTFPBTPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.66

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

7.08

-3.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.66

24.51

-13.85

TDTF vs. PBTP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDTF Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the PBTP Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDTF and PBTP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDTFPBTPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

3.05

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

1.17

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

1.30

-0.83

Drawdowns

TDTF vs. PBTP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDTF drawdown since its inception was -12.02%, which is greater than PBTP's maximum drawdown of -5.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDTF and PBTP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDTFPBTPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.02%

-5.44%

-6.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.58%

-0.66%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.79%

-1.03%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.02%

-5.44%

-6.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-0.02%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.91%

-0.75%

-2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

0.19%

+0.29%

Volatility

TDTF vs. PBTP - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF) has a higher volatility of 0.73% compared to Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP) at 0.40%. This indicates that TDTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBTP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDTFPBTPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

0.40%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.97%

1.03%

+0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06%

1.54%

+1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.69%

2.85%

+2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.07%

2.64%

+2.43%

TDTF vs. PBTP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDTF has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than PBTP's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TDTF vs. PBTP - Dividend Comparison

TDTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than PBTP's 3.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBTP
Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF
3.10%3.82%2.59%2.36%5.33%3.12%1.25%2.12%2.33%0.73%0.00%0.00%
TDTF
FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
4.71%4.58%3.98%3.97%7.60%4.55%1.13%1.80%2.60%2.20%1.51%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDTF and PBTP have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDTF has higher volatility (0.73%) compared to PBTP (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDTF dropped -12.02% vs PBTP's -5.44%.

On 5-year performance, PBTP leads with 3.32% vs 1.72% for TDTF. On fees, PBTP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, PBTP has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PBTP has performed better with a 3.32% return vs 1.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBTP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for TDTF.

TDTF has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 3.10% for PBTP.

TDTF tracks iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS, while PBTP tracks ICE BofA U.S. Treasuries Inflation-Linked (0-5 Y). They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for TDTF and 0.07% for PBTP.

PBTP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDTF and PBTP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer