PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDTF vs. HYGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDTF vs. HYGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF) and FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TDTF having a 1.52% return and HYGV slightly higher at 1.56%.


TDTF

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
1.52%
6M
1.29%
1Y
4.72%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
1.72%
10Y*
2.94%

HYGV

1D
0.14%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.85%
1Y
6.88%
3Y*
8.51%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDTF vs. HYGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TDTF
FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
1.52%7.83%2.40%4.10%-9.73%5.54%9.98%7.99%-0.50%
HYGV
FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund
1.56%7.92%8.02%12.11%-12.60%5.93%8.01%15.76%-4.15%

Correlation

The correlation between TDTF and HYGV is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018

0.27

The correlation between TDTF and HYGV shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.46 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDTF vs. HYGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDTF
TDTF Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
TDTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDTF Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
TDTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDTF Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

HYGV
HYGV Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
HYGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDTF vs. HYGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF) and FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDTFHYGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.35

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

2.57

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.06

11.11

-1.06

TDTF vs. HYGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDTF Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the HYGV Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDTF and HYGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDTFHYGVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

1.80

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.47

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.55

-0.08

Drawdowns

TDTF vs. HYGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDTF drawdown since its inception was -12.02%, smaller than the maximum HYGV drawdown of -23.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDTF and HYGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDTFHYGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.02%

-23.47%

+11.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.58%

-2.68%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.79%

-5.56%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.02%

-17.12%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-0.13%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.91%

-3.32%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

0.62%

-0.14%

Volatility

TDTF vs. HYGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF) is 0.71%, while FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV) has a volatility of 1.18%. This indicates that TDTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDTFHYGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

1.18%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.97%

3.01%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05%

3.85%

-0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.69%

7.59%

-1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.07%

9.20%

-4.13%

TDTF vs. HYGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDTF has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than HYGV's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDTF vs. HYGV - Dividend Comparison

TDTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, less than HYGV's 7.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYGV
FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund
7.40%7.48%8.20%8.77%7.64%6.07%6.18%7.95%5.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDTF
FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
4.71%4.58%3.98%3.97%7.60%4.55%1.13%1.80%2.60%2.20%1.51%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDTF and HYGV have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYGV has higher volatility (1.18%) compared to TDTF (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDTF dropped -12.02% vs HYGV's -23.47%.

On 5-year performance, HYGV leads with 3.52% vs 1.72% for TDTF. On fees, TDTF is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, TDTF has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HYGV has performed better with a 3.52% return vs 1.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDTF is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for HYGV.

HYGV has the higher dividend yield at 7.40%, compared with 4.71% for TDTF.

TDTF is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while HYGV is High Yield Bonds. TDTF tracks iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS, while HYGV tracks Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for TDTF and 0.37% for HYGV.

HYGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDTF and HYGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer