PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDSC vs. COMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDSC vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDSC achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.


TDSC

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.77%
YTD
11.42%
6M
10.93%
1Y
19.88%
3Y*
11.01%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*

COMT

1D
0.78%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
39.67%
6M
39.06%
1Y
47.51%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDSC vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TDSC
Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF
11.42%6.56%7.10%7.63%-19.67%14.81%-0.11%
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
39.67%6.07%5.96%-6.56%19.45%36.88%4.76%

Correlation

The correlation between TDSC and COMT is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020

0.16

The correlation between TDSC and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TDSC vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TDSC
COMT

Technology

28.5%

-

Healthcare

19.9%

-

Energy

17.6%

-

Utilities

15.0%

-

Communication Services

4.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.3%

-

Financial Services

3.9%
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%

-

Industrials

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

0.7%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

TDSC
28.5%
COMT

-

Healthcare

TDSC
19.9%
COMT

-

Energy

TDSC
17.6%
COMT

-

Utilities

TDSC
15.0%
COMT

-

Communication Services

TDSC
4.7%
COMT

-

Consumer Cyclical

TDSC
4.3%
COMT

-

Financial Services

TDSC
3.9%
COMT
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

TDSC
3.4%
COMT

-

Industrials

TDSC
2.0%
COMT

-

Basic Materials

TDSC
0.7%
COMT

-

Real Estate

TDSC
0.1%
COMT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDSC vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDSC
TDSC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TDSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDSC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TDSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDSC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDSC vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDSCCOMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.40

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

5.95

-2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.51

14.11

+0.40

TDSC vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDSC Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDSC and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDSCCOMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

2.24

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.64

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.20

+0.20

Drawdowns

TDSC vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDSC drawdown since its inception was -21.51%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSC and COMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDSCCOMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.51%

-51.89%

+30.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.35%

-8.02%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

-13.31%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.51%

-29.00%

+7.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-4.82%

+4.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.38%

-24.07%

+14.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

3.38%

-2.01%

Volatility

TDSC vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) is 2.06%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that TDSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDSCCOMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

7.37%

-5.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.61%

18.80%

-12.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.90%

21.29%

-12.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.28%

21.06%

-10.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.22%

18.89%

-8.67%

TDSC vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDSC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDSC vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

TDSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than COMT's 5.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
5.54%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%
TDSC
Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF
2.01%2.92%2.06%2.06%1.76%1.11%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDSC and COMT have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to TDSC (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDSC dropped -21.51% vs COMT's -51.89%.

On 5-year performance, COMT leads with 13.50% vs 3.28% for TDSC. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, TDSC has been the lower-risk option at 2.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, COMT has performed better with a 13.50% return vs 3.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TDSC.

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 2.01% for TDSC.

TDSC is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TDSC and 0.48% for COMT.

TDSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDSC and COMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer