PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDSB vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDSB vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDSB achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 76.48% return.


TDSB

1D
-0.32%
1M
-0.92%
6M
0.83%
YTD
2.89%
1Y
10.85%
3Y*
7.90%
5Y*
1.32%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.95%

DBO

1D
1.56%
1M
24.59%
6M
53.46%
YTD
76.48%
1Y
60.30%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
13.46%
10Y*
12.59%
ALL TIME*
0.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.01M$10.23M$13.95M
$51.73K$264.46K$138.96K

TDSB vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TDSB
Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF
2.89%12.95%3.56%4.71%-16.83%8.44%-1.46%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
76.48%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%15.80%

Correlation

The correlation between TDSB and DBO is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020

0.08

The correlation between TDSB and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDSB vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TDSB
TDSB Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
TDSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDSB Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
TDSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDSB Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TDSB vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TDSBDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.25

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

2.01

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.19

6.09

+2.10

TDSB vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDSB and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDSB vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDSB drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSB and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDSBDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.56%

-90.18%

+70.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.64%

-27.73%

+23.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.84%

-28.20%

+21.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.56%

-37.68%

+18.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-53.56%

+51.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-62.20%

+53.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

9.96%

-8.59%

Volatility

TDSB vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) is 1.37%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 17.75%. This indicates that TDSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDSBDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

17.75%

-16.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.33%

33.77%

-28.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.41%

38.53%

-32.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.34%

33.35%

-26.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.51%

32.20%

-24.69%

TDSB vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDSB has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDSB vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

TDSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than DBO's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.99%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
TDSB
Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF
2.30%1.93%3.50%2.77%1.81%1.75%0.46%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDSB and DBO have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (17.75%) compared to TDSB (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDSB dropped -19.56% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 13.46% vs 1.32% for TDSB. On fees, TDSB is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, TDSB has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 13.46% return vs 1.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDSB is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

TDSB has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 1.99% for DBO.

TDSB is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TDSB and 0.78% for DBO.

TDSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDSB and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer