PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDSA vs. RHTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDSA vs. RHTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF (TDSA) and RH Tactical Outlook ETF (RHTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TDSA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RHTX

1D
-0.72%
1M
2.95%
YTD
8.61%
6M
10.15%
1Y
25.91%
3Y*
15.78%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDSA vs. RHTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


TDSA vs. RHTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TDSA
RHTX

Real Estate

35.5%
3.9%

Technology

24.3%
30.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
9.8%

Industrials

6.7%
13.5%

Healthcare

6.7%
9.0%

Communication Services

6.5%
6.9%

Financial Services

4.7%
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
4.1%

Energy

1.6%
4.2%

Basic Materials

1.2%
2.9%

Utilities

1.0%
2.5%

Real Estate

TDSA
35.5%
RHTX
3.9%

Technology

TDSA
24.3%
RHTX
30.6%

Consumer Cyclical

TDSA
8.6%
RHTX
9.8%

Industrials

TDSA
6.7%
RHTX
13.5%

Healthcare

TDSA
6.7%
RHTX
9.0%

Communication Services

TDSA
6.5%
RHTX
6.9%

Financial Services

TDSA
4.7%
RHTX
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

TDSA
3.1%
RHTX
4.1%

Energy

TDSA
1.6%
RHTX
4.2%

Basic Materials

TDSA
1.2%
RHTX
2.9%

Utilities

TDSA
1.0%
RHTX
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDSA vs. RHTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDSA

RHTX
RHTX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
RHTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RHTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
RHTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RHTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
RHTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDSA vs. RHTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF (TDSA) and RH Tactical Outlook ETF (RHTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TDSA vs. RHTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDSARHTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

Drawdowns

TDSA vs. RHTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDSA drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum RHTX drawdown of -24.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSA and RHTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDSARHTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-24.68%

+24.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.37%

+1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-9.63%

+9.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

Volatility

TDSA vs. RHTX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDSARHTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

15.06%

-15.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

18.03%

-18.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

18.03%

-18.03%

TDSA vs. RHTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDSA has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than RHTX's 1.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDSA vs. RHTX - Dividend Comparison

Neither TDSA nor RHTX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, TDSA is cheaper at 0.83% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TDSA is cheaper with a 0.83% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for RHTX.

TDSA and RHTX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Cabana and Adaptive. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for TDSA and 1.38% for RHTX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDSA and RHTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer