TDOT vs. BITC
TDOT (21Shares Polkadot ETF) and BITC (Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. TDOT is passively managed, while BITC is actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TDOT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for BITC.
Performance
TDOT vs. BITC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TDOT
- 1D
- 6.00%
- 1M
- -8.94%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITC
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- -6.66%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- -24.26%
- 3Y*
- 28.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDOT vs. BITC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TDOT 21Shares Polkadot ETF | -39.88% |
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF | -3.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDOT and BITC is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDOT vs. BITC — Risk / Return Rank
TDOT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BITC
TDOT vs. BITC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Polkadot ETF (TDOT) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TDOT | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.83 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.08 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TDOT vs. BITC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDOT drawdown since its inception was -48.70%, which is greater than BITC's maximum drawdown of -38.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDOT and BITC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDOT | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.70% | -38.51% | -10.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -27.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.44% | -31.33% | -14.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.14% | -16.73% | -8.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 19.79% | — |
Volatility
TDOT vs. BITC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDOT | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.36% | 25.02% | +38.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.36% | 46.05% | +17.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.36% | 46.05% | +17.31% |
TDOT vs. BITC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDOT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BITC's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDOT vs. BITC - Dividend Comparison
TDOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than BITC's 3.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF | 3.36% | 3.36% | 42.68% | 5.82% |
TDOT 21Shares Polkadot ETF | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDOT and BITC have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TDOT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TDOT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for BITC.
BITC has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 1.40% for TDOT.
They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for TDOT and 0.88% for BITC.
Find the right allocation for TDOT and BITC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer