PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDOT vs. BFOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDOT vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 21Shares Polkadot ETF (TDOT) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TDOT

1D
-4.25%
1M
-29.29%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BFOC

1D
-0.67%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
-7.58%
6M
-7.79%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDOT vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TDOT and BFOC is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026

0.51

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDOT vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Polkadot ETF (TDOT) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TDOT vs. BFOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDOT vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDOT drawdown since its inception was -43.45%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDOT and BFOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDOTBFOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.45%

-18.41%

-25.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.45%

-18.36%

-25.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.48%

-12.84%

-8.64%

Volatility

TDOT vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDOTBFOCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.86%

12.31%

+52.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.86%

12.31%

+52.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.86%

12.31%

+52.55%

TDOT vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDOT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDOT vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison

TDOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


TDOT and BFOC have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TDOT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TDOT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.

TDOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.

TDOT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for TDOT and 0.90% for BFOC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDOT and BFOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer