TDOG vs. EZPZ
TDOG (21Shares Dogecoin ETF) and EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - TDOG tracks the Dogecoin (DOGE) while EZPZ tracks the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TDOG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZPZ.
Performance
TDOG vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TDOG
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -16.17%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- 6M
- -35.74%
- YTD
- -29.25%
- 1Y
- -47.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDOG vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TDOG 21Shares Dogecoin ETF | -41.78% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -31.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDOG and EZPZ is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDOG vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank
TDOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EZPZ
TDOG vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Dogecoin ETF (TDOG) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TDOG | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.83 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.34 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TDOG vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDOG drawdown since its inception was -43.14%, smaller than the maximum EZPZ drawdown of -56.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDOG and EZPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDOG | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.14% | -56.63% | +13.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -56.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.07% | -52.29% | +10.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.41% | -24.29% | -0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 35.47% | — |
Volatility
TDOG vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDOG | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 37.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.51% | 47.80% | +15.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.51% | 47.47% | +16.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.51% | 47.47% | +16.04% |
TDOG vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDOG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDOG vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither TDOG nor EZPZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TDOG and EZPZ have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDOG.
TDOG and EZPZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
TDOG tracks Dogecoin (DOGE), while EZPZ tracks CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price. They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDOG and 0.19% for EZPZ.
Find the right allocation for TDOG and EZPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer