PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDIV vs. NXTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDIV vs. NXTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDIV achieves a 30.57% return, which is significantly lower than NXTG's 54.54% return. Over the past 10 years, TDIV has outperformed NXTG with an annualized return of 19.34%, while NXTG has yielded a comparatively lower 17.94% annualized return.


TDIV

1D
-1.79%
1M
15.82%
YTD
30.57%
6M
28.79%
1Y
53.63%
3Y*
33.27%
5Y*
19.29%
10Y*
19.34%

NXTG

1D
-0.82%
1M
22.84%
YTD
54.54%
6M
55.39%
1Y
82.82%
3Y*
35.56%
5Y*
19.17%
10Y*
17.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDIV vs. NXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
30.57%25.27%24.43%36.71%-22.13%29.49%17.55%33.27%-3.18%21.95%
NXTG
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
54.54%28.46%12.85%28.74%-24.70%21.81%27.58%29.58%-17.25%28.02%

Correlation

The correlation between TDIV and NXTG is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2012

0.76

The correlation between TDIV and NXTG shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TDIV vs. NXTG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TDIV
NXTG

Technology

85.0%
66.1%

Communication Services

13.4%
21.7%

Industrials

1.6%
4.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

7.5%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

TDIV
85.0%
NXTG
66.1%

Communication Services

TDIV
13.4%
NXTG
21.7%

Industrials

TDIV
1.6%
NXTG
4.3%

Basic Materials

TDIV

-

NXTG

-

Consumer Cyclical

TDIV

-

NXTG
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

TDIV

-

NXTG

-

Energy

TDIV

-

NXTG

-

Financial Services

TDIV

-

NXTG

-

Healthcare

TDIV

-

NXTG

-

Real Estate

TDIV

-

NXTG
7.5%

Utilities

TDIV

-

NXTG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDIV vs. NXTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

NXTG
NXTG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
NXTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTG Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDIV vs. NXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDIVNXTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.77

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.02

8.10

-3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.64

31.73

-16.09

TDIV vs. NXTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is lower than the NXTG Sharpe Ratio of 4.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDIV and NXTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDIVNXTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

4.52

-1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

1.08

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.95

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.69

+0.19

Drawdowns

TDIV vs. NXTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDIV drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, roughly equal to the maximum NXTG drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV and NXTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDIVNXTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.97%

-33.61%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.74%

-10.28%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.00%

-17.75%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.97%

-33.61%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.97%

-33.61%

+1.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-0.82%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.84%

-7.87%

+3.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

2.62%

+0.82%

Volatility

TDIV vs. NXTG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) is 6.86%, while First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) has a volatility of 8.27%. This indicates that TDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NXTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDIVNXTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

8.27%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

15.26%

-1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.47%

18.44%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.67%

17.93%

+2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.85%

18.88%

+1.97%

TDIV vs. NXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDIV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than NXTG's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDIV vs. NXTG - Dividend Comparison

TDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, which matches NXTG's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NXTG
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
1.11%1.56%1.51%2.15%2.04%1.97%1.04%0.77%1.27%1.65%1.23%1.11%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.12%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDIV and NXTG have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NXTG has higher volatility (8.27%) compared to TDIV (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDIV dropped -31.97% vs NXTG's -33.61%.

On 10-year performance, TDIV leads with 19.34% vs 17.94% for NXTG. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TDIV has been the lower-risk option at 6.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 19.34% return vs 17.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for NXTG.

TDIV and NXTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.12%.

TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index, while NXTG tracks Indxx 5G & NextG Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDIV and 0.70% for NXTG.

NXTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.52 vs 2.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDIV and NXTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer