PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDIV vs. IGLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDIV vs. IGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDIV achieves a 30.57% return, which is significantly higher than IGLD's 1.69% return.


TDIV

1D
-1.79%
1M
15.82%
YTD
30.57%
6M
28.79%
1Y
53.63%
3Y*
33.27%
5Y*
19.29%
10Y*
19.34%

IGLD

1D
-0.81%
1M
-1.33%
YTD
1.69%
6M
4.44%
1Y
24.53%
3Y*
23.01%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDIV vs. IGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
30.57%25.27%24.43%36.71%-22.13%25.14%
IGLD
FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
1.69%47.46%19.36%9.24%-2.34%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between TDIV and IGLD is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2021

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDIV vs. IGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLD
IGLD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
IGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDIV vs. IGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDIVIGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.22

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.02

1.40

+3.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.64

3.82

+11.81

TDIV vs. IGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is higher than the IGLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDIV and IGLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDIVIGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

1.06

+1.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.86

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.94

-0.06

Drawdowns

TDIV vs. IGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDIV drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, which is greater than IGLD's maximum drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV and IGLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDIVIGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.97%

-18.59%

-13.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.74%

-17.56%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.00%

-17.56%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.97%

-18.59%

-13.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-15.16%

+13.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.84%

-5.24%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

6.43%

-2.99%

Volatility

TDIV vs. IGLD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) at 5.12%. This indicates that TDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDIVIGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

5.12%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

21.01%

-7.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.47%

23.24%

-4.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.67%

15.17%

+5.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.85%

15.00%

+5.85%

TDIV vs. IGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDIV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than IGLD's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDIV vs. IGLD - Dividend Comparison

TDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than IGLD's 17.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGLD
FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
17.92%9.91%20.81%7.85%4.45%2.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.12%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDIV and IGLD have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDIV has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to IGLD (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDIV dropped -31.97% vs IGLD's -18.59%.

On 5-year performance, TDIV leads with 19.29% vs 13.02% for IGLD. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IGLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 19.29% return vs 13.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IGLD.

IGLD has the higher dividend yield at 17.92%, compared with 1.12% for TDIV.

TDIV is categorized as Technology Equities, while IGLD is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDIV and 0.85% for IGLD.

TDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDIV and IGLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer