TDIV vs. FXL
TDIV (First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund) and FXL (First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund) are both Technology Equities funds from First Trust - TDIV tracks the NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index while FXL tracks the StrataQuant Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TDIV returned 18.57%/yr vs 20.76%/yr for FXL. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TDIV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FXL.
Performance
TDIV vs. FXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDIV achieves a 21.17% return, which is significantly lower than FXL's 25.90% return. Over the past 10 years, TDIV has underperformed FXL with an annualized return of 18.57%, while FXL has yielded a comparatively higher 20.76% annualized return.
TDIV
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 21.17%
- 6M
- 20.34%
- 1Y
- 37.96%
- 3Y*
- 28.42%
- 5Y*
- 17.37%
- 10Y*
- 18.57%
FXL
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 9.18%
- YTD
- 25.90%
- 6M
- 24.57%
- 1Y
- 41.44%
- 3Y*
- 23.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- 20.76%
TDIV vs. FXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 21.17% | 25.27% | 24.43% | 36.71% | -22.13% | 29.49% | 17.55% | 33.27% | -3.18% | 21.95% |
FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund | 25.90% | 13.29% | 16.13% | 40.50% | -30.44% | 18.20% | 54.20% | 38.66% | 2.72% | 35.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDIV and FXL is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2012 | 0.86 |
The correlation between TDIV and FXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
TDIV vs. FXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TDIV
FXL
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
TDIV
FXL
Communication Services
TDIV
FXL
Industrials
TDIV
FXL
Basic Materials
TDIV
-
FXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
TDIV
-
FXL
Consumer Defensive
TDIV
-
FXL
-
Energy
TDIV
-
FXL
-
Financial Services
TDIV
-
FXL
Healthcare
TDIV
-
FXL
-
Real Estate
TDIV
-
FXL
-
Utilities
TDIV
-
FXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDIV vs. FXL — Risk / Return Rank
TDIV
FXL
TDIV vs. FXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TDIV | FXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.28 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 2.89 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.78 | 9.33 | +0.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TDIV vs. FXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDIV drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, smaller than the maximum FXL drawdown of -61.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV and FXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDIV | FXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.97% | -61.41% | +29.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.35% | -13.56% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.00% | -28.27% | +5.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.97% | -38.49% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.97% | -38.49% | +6.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | -5.44% | -3.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -11.36% | +6.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 4.19% | -0.45% |
Volatility
TDIV vs. FXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) is 9.90%, while First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) has a volatility of 11.12%. This indicates that TDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDIV | FXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.90% | 11.12% | -1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.62% | 19.36% | -3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.72% | 23.86% | -4.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.90% | 25.37% | -4.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 25.41% | -4.45% |
TDIV vs. FXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDIV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FXL's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDIV vs. FXL - Dividend Comparison
TDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, while FXL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.11% | 0.41% | 0.34% | 0.11% | 0.04% | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.27% | 1.12% | 0.36% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 1.20% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.74% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 2.07% | 2.27% | 2.97% | 2.27% | 2.45% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDIV and FXL have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXL has higher volatility (11.12%) compared to TDIV (9.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDIV dropped -31.97% vs FXL's -61.41%.
On 10-year performance, FXL leads with 20.76% vs 18.57% for TDIV. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TDIV has been the lower-risk option at 9.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FXL has performed better with a 20.76% return vs 18.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXL.
TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.00% for FXL.
TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index, while FXL tracks StrataQuant Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDIV and 0.61% for FXL.
TDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDIV and FXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer