PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDIV vs. AIVC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDIV vs. AIVC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDIV achieves a 20.64% return, which is significantly lower than AIVC's 64.02% return. Over the past 10 years, TDIV has outperformed AIVC with an annualized return of 17.38%, while AIVC has yielded a comparatively lower 15.61% annualized return.


TDIV

1D
3.50%
1M
4.31%
6M
19.61%
YTD
20.64%
1Y
29.74%
3Y*
27.65%
5Y*
16.92%
10Y*
17.38%
ALL TIME*
15.98%

AIVC

1D
4.53%
1M
4.59%
6M
57.12%
YTD
64.02%
1Y
102.13%
3Y*
44.54%
5Y*
16.57%
10Y*
15.61%
ALL TIME*
15.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$719.86K$1.17M$2.81M
$13.49M$12.95M$15.18M

TDIV vs. AIVC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
20.64%25.27%24.43%36.71%-22.13%29.49%17.55%33.27%-3.18%21.95%
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
64.02%39.94%18.22%39.28%-38.91%-7.23%41.45%27.78%-18.62%35.42%

Correlation

The correlation between TDIV and AIVC is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2016

0.71

The correlation between TDIV and AIVC shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TDIV vs. AIVC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TDIV
AIVC

Technology

83.2%
91.0%

Communication Services

15.0%
2.1%

Industrials

1.9%
1.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

TDIV
83.2%
AIVC
91.0%

Communication Services

TDIV
15.0%
AIVC
2.1%

Industrials

TDIV
1.9%
AIVC
1.7%

Basic Materials

TDIV

-

AIVC

-

Consumer Cyclical

TDIV

-

AIVC
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

TDIV

-

AIVC

-

Energy

TDIV

-

AIVC

-

Financial Services

TDIV

-

AIVC
0.0%

Healthcare

TDIV

-

AIVC

-

Real Estate

TDIV

-

AIVC

-

Utilities

TDIV

-

AIVC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDIV vs. AIVC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

AIVC
AIVC Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AIVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVC Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVC Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TDIV vs. AIVC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TDIVAIVCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.41

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

4.41

-2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.99

15.43

-10.44

TDIV vs. AIVC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the AIVC Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDIV and AIVC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDIV vs. AIVC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDIV drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, smaller than the maximum AIVC drawdown of -56.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV and AIVC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDIVAIVCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.97%

-56.11%

+24.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.34%

-23.29%

+6.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.00%

-32.55%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.97%

-53.58%

+21.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.97%

-56.11%

+24.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.26%

-9.81%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-16.35%

+11.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.97%

6.64%

-0.67%

Volatility

TDIV vs. AIVC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) is 6.55%, while Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) has a volatility of 14.00%. This indicates that TDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIVC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDIVAIVCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.55%

14.00%

-7.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.62%

30.18%

-13.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.93%

35.46%

-14.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.18%

31.46%

-10.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.03%

27.56%

-6.53%

TDIV vs. AIVC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDIV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AIVC's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDIV vs. AIVC - Dividend Comparison

TDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than AIVC's 0.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
0.10%0.17%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.39%1.16%0.38%0.92%0.64%0.00%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.30%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDIV and AIVC have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIVC has higher volatility (14.00%) compared to TDIV (6.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDIV dropped -31.97% vs AIVC's -56.11%.

On 10-year performance, TDIV leads with 17.38% vs 15.61% for AIVC. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TDIV has been the lower-risk option at 6.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 17.38% return vs 15.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for AIVC.

TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.10% for AIVC.

TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index, while AIVC tracks Bloomberg AI Value Chain Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDIV and 0.59% for AIVC.

AIVC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDIV and AIVC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer