PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDIV.L vs. WQDS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDIV.L vs. WQDS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TDIV.L is traded in USD, while WQDS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the WQDS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDIV.L achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly lower than WQDS.L's 15.87% return.


TDIV.L

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.36%
6M
9.22%
YTD
10.69%
1Y
28.89%
3Y*
22.29%
5Y*
17.57%
10Y*
13.69%

WQDS.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.37%
6M
14.07%
YTD
15.87%
1Y
29.54%
3Y*
18.61%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDIV.L vs. WQDS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDIV.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
10.69%40.41%8.93%15.44%9.29%18.14%-2.30%37.03%-6.76%2.07%
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
15.87%24.26%9.82%16.65%-7.07%16.41%-0.41%23.53%-10.68%-15.17%

Correlation

The correlation between TDIV.L and WQDS.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017

0.74

The correlation between TDIV.L and WQDS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDIV.L vs. WQDS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDIV.L
TDIV.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TDIV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

WQDS.L
WQDS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDIV.L vs. WQDS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TDIV.LWQDS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.45

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.40

3.62

+1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.16

13.55

+1.61

TDIV.L vs. WQDS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDIV.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDIV.L and WQDS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDIV.L vs. WQDS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDIV.L drawdown since its inception was -37.94%, roughly equal to the maximum WQDS.L drawdown of -37.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV.L and WQDS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDIV.LWQDS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.94%

-37.21%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.27%

-8.11%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.89%

-14.02%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

-21.68%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.22%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-8.83%

+4.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.17%

-0.29%

Volatility

TDIV.L vs. WQDS.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.L) has a higher volatility of 3.57% compared to iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) at 2.75%. This indicates that TDIV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WQDS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDIV.LWQDS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

2.75%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.55%

9.35%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.21%

11.73%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.56%

13.79%

+0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.20%

16.24%

-0.04%

TDIV.L vs. WQDS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TDIV.L and WQDS.L have an expense ratio of 0.38%.


Dividends

TDIV.L vs. WQDS.L - Dividend Comparison

TDIV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than WQDS.L's 2.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDIV.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.14%3.49%4.36%4.82%4.49%4.14%3.88%4.37%5.77%4.50%
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.15%2.34%2.56%2.86%2.97%2.70%3.03%3.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDIV.L and WQDS.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.38% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TDIV.L and WQDS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.38% per year.

TDIV.L is categorized as Dividend, while WQDS.L is Global Equities. TDIV.L tracks VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF, while WQDS.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDIV.L and WQDS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer