TDIV.L vs. LGGG.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

TDIV.L (VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and LGGG.L (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - TDIV.L tracks the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index while LGGG.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TDIV.L returned 17.81%/yr vs 11.58%/yr for LGGG.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TDIV.L charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for LGGG.L.

Performance

TDIV.L vs. LGGG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TDIV.L) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

TDIV.L is traded in USD, while LGGG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LGGG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDIV.L achieves a 11.84% return, which is significantly higher than LGGG.L's 9.00% return.

TDIV.L

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 2.15%
• 6M: 10.53%
• YTD: 11.84%
• 1Y: 29.81%
• 3Y*: 22.34%
• 5Y*: 17.81%
• 10Y*: 13.83%

LGGG.L

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: -0.07%
• 6M: 7.40%
• YTD: 9.00%
• 1Y: 20.29%
• 3Y*: 18.57%
• 5Y*: 11.58%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDIV.L vs. LGGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TDIV.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	11.84%	40.41%	8.93%	15.44%	9.29%	18.14%	-2.30%	37.03%	-7.57%
LGGG.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF	9.00%	21.45%	19.11%	24.31%	-18.05%	22.41%	15.85%	27.93%	-29.10%

Correlation

The correlation between TDIV.L and LGGG.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018	0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between TDIV.L and LGGG.L has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

TDIV.L vs. LGGG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDIV.L

TDIV.L Risk / Return Rank: 93
TDIV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
TDIV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
TDIV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 92
TDIV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
TDIV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 91

LGGG.L

LGGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 75
LGGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
LGGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
LGGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 75
LGGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
LGGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDIV.L vs. LGGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TDIV.L) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TDIV.L	LGGG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	1.71	+0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.61	2.55	+1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.30	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.64	2.31	+3.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.83	9.78	+6.05

TDIV.L vs. LGGG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDIV.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the LGGG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDIV.L and LGGG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TDIV.L vs. LGGG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDIV.L drawdown since its inception was -37.94%, roughly equal to the maximum LGGG.L drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV.L and LGGG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	TDIV.L	LGGG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.94%	-37.64%	-0.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.27%	-8.74%	+3.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.89%	-18.96%	+5.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.52%	-26.41%	+7.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.55%	+1.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.99%	-8.76%	+4.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.88%	2.07%	-0.19%

Volatility

TDIV.L vs. LGGG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TDIV.L) is 2.90%, while L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) has a volatility of 3.08%. This indicates that TDIV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TDIV.L	LGGG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.90%	3.08%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.56%	9.26%	-0.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.22%	11.83%	-0.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.56%	20.51%	-5.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.20%	21.77%	-5.57%

TDIV.L vs. LGGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDIV.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than LGGG.L's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

TDIV.L vs. LGGG.L - Dividend Comparison

TDIV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, while LGGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LGGG.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TDIV.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	3.10%	3.49%	4.36%	4.82%	4.49%	4.14%	3.88%	4.37%	5.77%	4.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TDIV.L and LGGG.L in my portfolio?

TDIV.L and LGGG.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TDIV.L or LGGG.L?

On fees, LGGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TDIV.L or LGGG.L?

LGGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDIV.L.

What is the main difference between TDIV.L and LGGG.L?

TDIV.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index, while LGGG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TDIV.L and 0.10% for LGGG.L.