PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDIC vs. FATN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TDIC vs. FATN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dreamland Limited (TDIC) and FatPipe, Inc (FATN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDIC achieves a -89.66% return, which is significantly lower than FATN's 200.99% return.


TDIC

1D
-6.25%
1M
-50.21%
6M
-90.87%
YTD
-89.66%
1Y
-99.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-99.39%

FATN

1D
18.75%
1M
1.67%
6M
241.57%
YTD
200.99%
1Y
3.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-4.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$555.65K$467.45K$1.86M
$218.85K$4.80M$18.39M

TDIC vs. FATN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TDIC
Dreamland Limited
-89.66%-94.70%
FATN
FatPipe, Inc
200.99%-75.51%

Correlation

The correlation between TDIC and FATN is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025

-0.00

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TDIC:

$587.32K

FATN:

$85.27M

EPS

TDIC:

-$3.33

FATN:

$0.39

PS Ratio

TDIC:

1.36

FATN:

4.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

TDIC:

$102.15M

FATN:

$20.30M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TDIC:

$20.72M

FATN:

$17.68M

EBITDA (TTM)

TDIC:

-$17.74M

FATN:

$4.11M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDIC vs. FATN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TDIC
TDIC Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TDIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIC Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIC Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

FATN
FATN Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FATN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FATN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FATN Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FATN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FATN Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TDIC vs. FATN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dreamland Limited (TDIC) and FatPipe, Inc (FATN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TDICFATNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.14

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

-0.09

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.14

-0.12

-1.02

TDIC vs. FATN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDIC Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the FATN Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDIC and FATN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDIC vs. FATN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDIC drawdown since its inception was -99.74%, which is greater than FATN's maximum drawdown of -88.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIC and FATN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDICFATNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.74%

-88.85%

-10.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.74%

-83.69%

-16.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.74%

-53.23%

-46.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-77.93%

-60.81%

-17.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

86.81%

58.83%

+27.98%

Volatility

TDIC vs. FATN - Volatility Comparison

Dreamland Limited (TDIC) has a higher volatility of 37.27% compared to FatPipe, Inc (FATN) at 31.02%. This indicates that TDIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FATN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDICFATNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.27%

31.02%

+6.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

213.39%

115.72%

+97.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

273.45%

150.70%

+122.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

271.88%

178.32%

+93.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

271.88%

178.32%

+93.56%

Dividends

TDIC vs. FATN - Dividend Comparison

Neither TDIC nor FATN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

TDIC vs. FATN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dreamland Limited and FatPipe, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TDIC and FATN have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDIC has higher volatility (37.27%) compared to FATN (31.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDIC dropped -99.74% vs FATN's -88.85%.

FATN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.05 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDIC and FATN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer