TDI vs. KEMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TDI (Touchstone Dynamic International ETF) and KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. TDI is actively managed, while KEMX is passively managed. Over the past year, TDI returned 42.61% vs 79.97% for KEMX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TDI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for KEMX.

Performance

TDI vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Dynamic International ETF (TDI) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDI achieves a 18.78% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 42.26% return.

TDI

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: 4.89%
• YTD: 18.78%
• 6M: 22.24%
• 1Y: 42.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KEMX

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 13.02%
• YTD: 42.26%
• 6M: 47.92%
• 1Y: 79.97%
• 3Y*: 29.66%
• 5Y*: 13.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDI vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TDI Touchstone Dynamic International ETF	18.78%	43.12%	6.39%	4.12%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	42.26%	38.28%	0.36%	5.46%

Correlation

The correlation between TDI and KEMX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2023	0.81

The correlation between TDI and KEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

TDI vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TDI	KEMX
Financial Services	21.5%	20.7%
Technology	19.1%	41.2%
Industrials	17.9%	8.6%
Energy	10.3%	4.8%
Healthcare	9.9%	1.7%
Basic Materials	9.4%	8.2%
Communication Services	5.2%	3.2%
Consumer Cyclical	4.8%	5.4%
Utilities	1.2%	2.0%
Consumer Defensive	0.6%	3.0%
Real Estate	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

TDI vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDI

TDI Risk / Return Rank: 74
TDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
TDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
TDI Omega Ratio Rank: 74
TDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
TDI Martin Ratio Rank: 75

KEMX

KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 91
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDI vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Dynamic International ETF (TDI) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TDI	KEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	3.59	-1.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	4.31	-1.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.62	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.54	5.24	-1.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.18	20.86	-6.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TDI vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDI Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is lower than the KEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDI and KEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TDI	KEMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	3.59	-1.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.74	0.68	+1.06

Drawdowns

TDI vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDI drawdown since its inception was -14.99%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDI and KEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TDI	KEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.99%	-38.80%	+23.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.09%	-15.36%	+3.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.62%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.13%	-1.31%	+0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.21%	-8.86%	+6.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.01%	3.85%	-0.84%

Volatility

TDI vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Touchstone Dynamic International ETF (TDI) is 6.02%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that TDI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TDI	KEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.02%	9.86%	-3.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.88%	19.90%	-5.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.31%	22.40%	-5.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.84%	18.21%	-1.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.84%	20.94%	-4.10%

TDI vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

TDI vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

TDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than KEMX's 2.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	2.31%	3.28%	3.39%	2.00%	4.10%	4.79%	1.69%	2.77%
TDI Touchstone Dynamic International ETF	1.63%	1.94%	3.39%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TDI and KEMX in my portfolio?

TDI and KEMX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TDI or KEMX?

KEMX has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to TDI (6.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDI dropped -14.99% vs KEMX's -38.80%.

Which ETF is better, TDI or KEMX?

On 1-year performance, KEMX leads with 79.97% vs 42.61% for TDI. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, TDI has been the lower-risk option at 6.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TDI or KEMX?

Over the 1-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 79.97% return vs 42.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TDI or KEMX?

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TDI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TDI or KEMX?

KEMX has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.63% for TDI.

What is the main difference between TDI and KEMX?

They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TDI and 0.25% for KEMX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.