PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDGB.L vs. PRWU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDGB.L vs. PRWU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TDGB.L is traded in GBP, while PRWU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PRWU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


TDGB.L

1D
0.48%
1M
0.92%
YTD
8.92%
6M
11.81%
1Y
29.32%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
17.70%
10Y*

PRWU.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDGB.L vs. PRWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
8.92%30.88%10.65%9.06%11.38%
PRWU.L
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)
0.00%0.00%20.63%18.25%1.23%

Correlation

The correlation between TDGB.L and PRWU.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

0.40

TDGB.L vs. PRWU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TDGB.L
PRWU.L

Financial Services

31.7%
15.8%

Energy

19.7%
4.0%

Healthcare

14.4%
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
6.1%

Communication Services

8.7%
8.1%

Utilities

6.2%
2.7%

Industrials

3.9%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
10.5%

Basic Materials

1.2%
3.2%

Technology

0.3%
27.0%

Real Estate

0.0%
2.1%

Financial Services

TDGB.L
31.7%
PRWU.L
15.8%

Energy

TDGB.L
19.7%
PRWU.L
4.0%

Healthcare

TDGB.L
14.4%
PRWU.L
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

TDGB.L
10.1%
PRWU.L
6.1%

Communication Services

TDGB.L
8.7%
PRWU.L
8.1%

Utilities

TDGB.L
6.2%
PRWU.L
2.7%

Industrials

TDGB.L
3.9%
PRWU.L
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

TDGB.L
3.8%
PRWU.L
10.5%

Basic Materials

TDGB.L
1.2%
PRWU.L
3.2%

Technology

TDGB.L
0.3%
PRWU.L
27.0%

Real Estate

TDGB.L
0.0%
PRWU.L
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDGB.L vs. PRWU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDGB.L
TDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

PRWU.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDGB.L vs. PRWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDGB.LPRWU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.72

TDGB.L vs. PRWU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDGB.LPRWU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

Drawdowns

TDGB.L vs. PRWU.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDGB.LPRWU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

Volatility

TDGB.L vs. PRWU.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDGB.LPRWU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.44%

TDGB.L vs. PRWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDGB.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWU.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDGB.L vs. PRWU.L - Dividend Comparison

TDGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, while PRWU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
PRWU.L
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.20%3.50%4.27%4.93%4.40%4.06%4.16%4.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDGB.L and PRWU.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRWU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRWU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDGB.L.

TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index, while PRWU.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TDGB.L and 0.05% for PRWU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDGB.L and PRWU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer