PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDG vs. RYCEY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TDG vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDG achieves a -5.55% return, which is significantly lower than RYCEY's 12.43% return. Over the past 10 years, TDG has outperformed RYCEY with an annualized return of 22.72%, while RYCEY has yielded a comparatively lower 8.49% annualized return.


TDG

1D
-0.12%
1M
4.55%
YTD
-5.55%
6M
-2.98%
1Y
-6.51%
3Y*
22.32%
5Y*
17.95%
10Y*
22.72%

RYCEY

1D
1.79%
1M
7.56%
YTD
12.43%
6M
19.66%
1Y
46.06%
3Y*
113.04%
5Y*
61.46%
10Y*
8.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDG vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDG
TransDigm Group Incorporated
-5.55%12.15%32.27%66.57%1.77%2.82%10.51%84.41%23.83%19.84%
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
12.43%123.64%88.21%253.27%-33.95%2.53%-82.05%-12.69%-7.35%40.70%

Correlation

The correlation between TDG and RYCEY is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2014

0.39

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TDG:

$73.10B

RYCEY:

$147.86B

EPS

TDG:

$34.79

RYCEY:

£0.99

PE Ratio

TDG:

36.10

RYCEY:

13.26

PEG Ratio

TDG:

1.07

RYCEY:

0.03

PS Ratio

TDG:

7.69

RYCEY:

2.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

TDG:

$9.50B

RYCEY:

£40.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TDG:

$5.61B

RYCEY:

£10.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

TDG:

$4.78B

RYCEY:

£8.04B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDG vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDG
TDG Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDG Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
TDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

RYCEY
RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDG vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TDGRYCEYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.23

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.26

2.13

-2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.44

5.98

-6.42

TDG vs. RYCEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDG Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the RYCEY Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDG and RYCEY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDG vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDG drawdown since its inception was -62.64%, smaller than the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDG and RYCEY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDGRYCEYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.64%

-99.07%

+36.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.30%

-21.75%

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.30%

-23.37%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.30%

-62.01%

+36.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.64%

-94.64%

+32.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.18%

-77.68%

+60.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-84.15%

+76.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.75%

7.73%

+7.02%

Volatility

TDG vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is 9.84%, while Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) has a volatility of 12.00%. This indicates that TDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDGRYCEYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.84%

12.00%

-2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.88%

32.70%

-10.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.32%

37.88%

-9.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.96%

43.48%

-15.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.83%

49.35%

-15.52%

Dividends

TDG vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison

TDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.17%, more than RYCEY's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
0.72%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.51%1.56%1.32%1.55%4.19%14.44%
TDG
TransDigm Group Incorporated
7.17%6.77%5.92%3.46%2.94%0.00%0.00%11.16%0.00%8.01%9.64%0.00%

Financials

TDG vs. RYCEY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TransDigm Group Incorporated and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
2.54B
11.64B
(TDG) Total Revenue
(RYCEY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TDG values in USD, RYCEY values in GBP

TDG vs. RYCEY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between TransDigm Group Incorporated and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
59.4%
27.4%
Portfolio components
TDG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TransDigm Group Incorporated reported a gross profit of 1.51B and revenue of 2.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.4%.

RYCEY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

TDG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TransDigm Group Incorporated reported an operating income of 1.18B and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

RYCEY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

TDG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TransDigm Group Incorporated reported a net income of 535.00M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in a net margin of 21.0%.

RYCEY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TDG and RYCEY have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYCEY has higher volatility (12.00%) compared to TDG (9.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDG dropped -62.64% vs RYCEY's -99.07%.

RYCEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDG and RYCEY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer