TDG vs. PULS
TDG (TransDigm Group Incorporated) is a stock, while PULS (PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PGIM. Over the past 5 years, TDG returned 18.10%/yr vs 4.21%/yr for PULS. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TDG vs. PULS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDG achieves a -8.61% return, which is significantly lower than PULS's 2.15% return.
TDG
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -12.06%
- YTD
- -8.61%
- 1Y
- -17.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 18.10%
- 10Y*
- 21.76%
PULS
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 5.46%
- 5Y*
- 4.21%
- 10Y*
- —
TDG vs. PULS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDG TransDigm Group Incorporated | -8.61% | 12.15% | 32.27% | 66.57% | 1.77% | 2.82% | 10.51% | 84.41% | 12.16% |
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 2.15% | 4.97% | 6.12% | 6.26% | 1.52% | 0.48% | 1.47% | 2.97% | 1.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDG and PULS is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2018 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDG vs. PULS — Risk / Return Rank
TDG
PULS
TDG vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TDG | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -11.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -27.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 6.42 | -5.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 50.65 | -51.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | 287.05 | -288.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TDG vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDG drawdown since its inception was -62.64%, which is greater than PULS's maximum drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDG and PULS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDG | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.64% | -5.85% | -56.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.30% | -0.09% | -25.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.30% | -0.34% | -24.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.30% | -0.79% | -24.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.86% | 0.00% | -19.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.98% | -0.09% | -7.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.27% | 0.02% | +15.25% |
Volatility
TDG vs. PULS - Volatility Comparison
TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) has a higher volatility of 8.02% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) at 0.15%. This indicates that TDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PULS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDG | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.02% | 0.15% | +7.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.73% | 0.32% | +22.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.04% | 0.43% | +28.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.06% | 0.70% | +27.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.89% | 1.32% | +32.57% |
Dividends
TDG vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison
TDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than PULS's 4.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.52% | 4.78% | 5.62% | 5.48% | 2.30% | 1.19% | 1.85% | 2.69% | 1.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDG TransDigm Group Incorporated | 7.41% | 6.77% | 5.92% | 3.46% | 2.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.16% | 0.00% | 8.01% | 9.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDG and PULS have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TDG has higher volatility (8.02%) compared to PULS (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDG dropped -62.64% vs PULS's -5.85%.
PULS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.57 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDG and PULS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer