PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDEC vs. QAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDEC vs. QAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDEC achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly higher than QAT's 2.99% return.


TDEC

1D
0.81%
1M
5.43%
YTD
7.08%
6M
10.69%
1Y
29.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QAT

1D
0.42%
1M
3.81%
YTD
2.99%
6M
2.78%
1Y
13.40%
3Y*
7.45%
5Y*
4.05%
10Y*
3.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDEC vs. QAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TDEC
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December
7.08%21.39%-0.70%
QAT
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF
2.99%8.81%-0.17%

Correlation

The correlation between TDEC and QAT is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2024

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDEC vs. QAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDEC
TDEC Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
TDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
TDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

QAT
QAT Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
QAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
QAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
QAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
QAT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDEC vs. QAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDECQATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.00

1.07

+1.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.18

1.50

+2.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.21

+0.49

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

1.16

+2.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.04

2.47

+13.56

TDEC vs. QAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDEC Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is higher than the QAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDEC and QAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDECQATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00

1.07

+1.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.82

0.08

+1.73

Drawdowns

TDEC vs. QAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDEC drawdown since its inception was -10.30%, smaller than the maximum QAT drawdown of -45.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDEC and QAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TDECQATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.30%

-45.21%

+34.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-10.60%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-9.81%

+9.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.08%

-19.26%

+18.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

4.98%

-3.15%

Volatility

TDEC vs. QAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) is 5.92%, while iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) has a volatility of 6.37%. This indicates that TDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TDECQATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

6.37%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.43%

9.89%

-1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.04%

12.63%

-2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.95%

14.91%

-2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.95%

17.58%

-5.63%

TDEC vs. QAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDEC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QAT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDEC vs. QAT - Dividend Comparison

TDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TDEC
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QAT
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF
3.41%3.51%5.90%3.92%4.78%2.33%2.63%3.57%4.63%4.10%3.51%4.49%