TDEC vs. QAT
TDEC (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December) and QAT (iShares MSCI Qatar ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDEC is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets, while QAT is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Qatar Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TDEC returned 22.62% vs 3.29% for QAT. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TDEC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for QAT.
Performance
TDEC vs. QAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDEC achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly higher than QAT's 0.12% return.
TDEC
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 8.78%
- 6M
- 10.67%
- 1Y
- 22.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QAT
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 3.29%
- 3Y*
- 4.42%
- 5Y*
- 3.49%
- 10Y*
- 4.36%
TDEC vs. QAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TDEC FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December | 8.78% | 21.39% | -0.70% |
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF | 0.12% | 8.81% | -0.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDEC and QAT is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2024 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDEC vs. QAT — Risk / Return Rank
TDEC
QAT
TDEC vs. QAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDEC | QAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.06 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 0.31 | +2.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.24 | 0.60 | +11.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDEC | QAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 0.25 | +2.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.78 | 0.07 | +1.71 |
Drawdowns
TDEC vs. QAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDEC drawdown since its inception was -10.30%, smaller than the maximum QAT drawdown of -45.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDEC and QAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDEC | QAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.30% | -45.21% | +34.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.16% | -10.60% | +2.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -12.33% | +11.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.04% | -19.18% | +18.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 5.54% | -3.69% |
Volatility
TDEC vs. QAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) is 2.72%, while iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that TDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDEC | QAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.72% | 5.06% | -2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | 10.47% | -1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.09% | 13.29% | -3.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.73% | 15.00% | -3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.73% | 17.56% | -5.83% |
TDEC vs. QAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDEC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QAT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDEC vs. QAT - Dividend Comparison
TDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF | 3.51% | 3.51% | 5.90% | 3.92% | 4.78% | 2.33% | 2.63% | 3.57% | 4.63% | 4.10% | 3.51% | 4.49% |
TDEC FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDEC and QAT have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QAT has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to TDEC (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDEC dropped -10.30% vs QAT's -45.21%.
On 1-year performance, TDEC leads with 22.62% vs 3.29% for QAT. On fees, QAT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TDEC has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TDEC has performed better with a 22.62% return vs 3.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QAT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TDEC.
QAT has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 0.00% for TDEC.
TDEC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QAT is Emerging Markets Equities. TDEC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while QAT tracks MSCI All Qatar Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TDEC and 0.59% for QAT.
TDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDEC and QAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer