PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDEC vs. FDND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDEC vs. FDND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDEC achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly higher than FDND's -4.93% return.


TDEC

1D
0.22%
1M
2.09%
YTD
10.01%
6M
11.45%
1Y
23.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDND

1D
-2.07%
1M
-5.31%
YTD
-4.93%
6M
-5.62%
1Y
-0.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDEC vs. FDND - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TDEC and FDND is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024

0.50

The correlation between TDEC and FDND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDEC vs. FDND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDEC
TDEC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
TDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
TDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FDND
FDND Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FDND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDND Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDND Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
FDND Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDND Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDEC vs. FDND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TDECFDNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.01

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

-0.02

+2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.58

-0.06

+12.64

TDEC vs. FDND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the FDND Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDEC and FDND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDEC vs. FDND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDEC drawdown since its inception was -10.30%, smaller than the maximum FDND drawdown of -24.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDEC and FDND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDECFDNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.30%

-24.12%

+13.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-20.49%

+12.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-11.11%

+11.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.04%

-5.72%

+4.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

8.59%

-6.71%

Volatility

TDEC vs. FDND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) is 3.93%, while FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) has a volatility of 7.32%. This indicates that TDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDECFDNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

7.32%

-3.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

15.06%

-5.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.50%

19.00%

-8.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.91%

21.51%

-9.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.91%

21.51%

-9.60%

TDEC vs. FDND - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDEC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FDND's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDEC vs. FDND - Dividend Comparison

TDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.59%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TDEC and FDND have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDND has higher volatility (7.32%) compared to TDEC (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDEC dropped -10.30% vs FDND's -24.12%.

On 1-year performance, TDEC leads with 23.62% vs -0.47% for FDND. On fees, FDND is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TDEC has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TDEC has performed better with a 23.62% return vs -0.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDND is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TDEC.

FDND has the higher dividend yield at 8.59%, compared with 0.00% for TDEC.

TDEC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FDND is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TDEC and 0.75% for FDND.

TDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDEC and FDND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer