TDEC vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TDEC (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - TDEC is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TDEC returned 22.62% vs 88.71% for BNO. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. TDEC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

TDEC vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDEC achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 85.31% return.

TDEC

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 8.78%
• 6M: 10.67%
• 1Y: 22.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: -2.71%
• 1M: -9.80%
• YTD: 85.31%
• 6M: 79.66%
• 1Y: 88.71%
• 3Y*: 26.74%
• 5Y*: 23.48%
• 10Y*: 13.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDEC vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TDEC FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December	8.78%	21.39%	-0.70%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	85.31%	-5.44%	2.32%

Correlation

The correlation between TDEC and BNO is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2024	-0.15

The correlation between TDEC and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to -0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TDEC vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDEC

TDEC Risk / Return Rank: 70
TDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
TDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
TDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 84
TDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
TDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 68

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 65
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 61
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDEC vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TDEC	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	2.15	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	2.65	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.36	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.79	4.99	-2.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.24	9.39	+2.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TDEC vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDEC and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TDEC	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	2.15	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.78	0.14	+1.64

Drawdowns

TDEC vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDEC drawdown since its inception was -10.30%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDEC and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	TDEC	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.30%	-87.06%	+76.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.16%	-17.87%	+9.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-12.72%	+12.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.04%	-40.16%	+39.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	9.48%	-7.63%

Volatility

TDEC vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) is 2.72%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.12%. This indicates that TDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TDEC	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.72%	14.12%	-11.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.03%	36.21%	-27.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.09%	41.56%	-31.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.73%	35.40%	-23.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.73%	36.69%	-24.96%

TDEC vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDEC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

TDEC vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

Neither TDEC nor BNO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TDEC and BNO in my portfolio?

TDEC and BNO have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TDEC or BNO?

BNO has higher volatility (14.12%) compared to TDEC (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDEC dropped -10.30% vs BNO's -87.06%.

Which ETF is better, TDEC or BNO?

On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 88.71% vs 22.62% for TDEC. On fees, BNO is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, TDEC has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TDEC or BNO?

Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 88.71% return vs 22.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TDEC or BNO?

BNO is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TDEC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TDEC or BNO?

TDEC and BNO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TDEC and BNO?

TDEC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BNO is Oil & Gas. TDEC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TDEC and 0.90% for BNO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.