TDAX vs. 3MST.L
TDAX (TDAQ Lift ETF) and 3MST.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP) are both Leveraged Equities funds. TDAX is actively managed, while 3MST.L is passively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TDAX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 3MST.L.
Performance
TDAX vs. 3MST.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TDAX
- 1D
- -4.29%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3MST.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -70.58%
- YTD
- 1,808.30%
- 6M
- 1,688.58%
- 1Y
- -26.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDAX vs. 3MST.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TDAX TDAQ Lift ETF | 13.76% |
3MST.L Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP | 1,805.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDAX and 3MST.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2026 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDAX vs. 3MST.L — Risk / Return Rank
TDAX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
3MST.L
TDAX vs. 3MST.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TDAQ Lift ETF (TDAX) and Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP (3MST.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TDAX | 3MST.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 10.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.26 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TDAX vs. 3MST.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDAX drawdown since its inception was -14.69%, smaller than the maximum 3MST.L drawdown of -99.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDAX and 3MST.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDAX | 3MST.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.69% | -99.93% | +85.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -99.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.56% | -94.75% | +88.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.75% | -83.28% | +79.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 74.65% | — |
Volatility
TDAX vs. 3MST.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDAX | 3MST.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 82.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 516.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.01% | 13,334.78% | -13,307.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.01% | 10,135.38% | -10,108.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.01% | 10,135.38% | -10,108.37% |
TDAX vs. 3MST.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than 3MST.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDAX vs. 3MST.L - Dividend Comparison
TDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.91%, while 3MST.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
3MST.L Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP | 0.00% |
TDAX TDAQ Lift ETF | 8.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDAX and 3MST.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 3MST.L is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3MST.L is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for TDAX.
They also come from different issuers: TappAlpha and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for TDAX and 0.75% for 3MST.L.
Find the right allocation for TDAX and 3MST.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer