PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TDAQ vs. EINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TDAQ vs. EINC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TDAQ (TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDAQ is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by TappAlpha, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. TDAQ is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. TDAQ charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

TDAQ vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TDAQ) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDAQ achieves a 14.87% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 25.97% return.

TDAQ

1D
-2.79%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
14.87%
6M
13.47%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

EINC

1D
1.37%
1M
-4.50%
YTD
25.97%
6M
25.98%
1Y
29.82%
3Y*
30.36%
5Y*
21.18%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDAQ vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
TDAQ
TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF		14.87%9.61%
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		25.97%1.44%

Correlation

The correlation between TDAQ and EINC is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025

-0.21

TDAQ vs. EINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
TDAQ
EINC

Technology

58.7%

-

Communication Services

14.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.4%

-

Healthcare

3.7%

-

Industrials

2.6%
2.5%

Utilities

1.2%
0.6%

Basic Materials

1.0%

-

Energy

0.5%
99.4%

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

TDAQ
58.7%
EINC

-

Communication Services

TDAQ
14.3%
EINC

-

Consumer Cyclical

TDAQ
11.4%
EINC

-

Consumer Defensive

TDAQ
6.4%
EINC

-

Healthcare

TDAQ
3.7%
EINC

-

Industrials

TDAQ
2.6%
EINC
2.5%

Utilities

TDAQ
1.2%
EINC
0.6%

Basic Materials

TDAQ
1.0%
EINC

-

Energy

TDAQ
0.5%
EINC
99.4%

Financial Services

TDAQ
0.2%
EINC

-

Real Estate

TDAQ
0.1%
EINC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF

VanEck Energy Income ETF

Often compared with TDAQ:
TDAQ vs. QQQITDAQ vs. TSPYTDAQ vs. QQQTDAQ vs. KQQQTDAQ vs. QDTETDAQ vs. GPIQTDAQ vs. QDVO
Often compared with EINC:
EINC vs. XLEEINC vs. BIZDEINC vs. EMLPEINC vs. SMHEINC vs. IXCEINC vs. VPUEINC vs. ERY

Return for Risk

TDAQ vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TDAQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EINC
EINC Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDAQ vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TDAQ) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

TDAQEINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

1.99

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

2.67

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.35

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

3.80

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

9.63

—

TDAQ vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDAQ vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDAQ drawdown since its inception was -11.31%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDAQ and EINC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TDAQEINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.31%

-87.55%

+76.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-7.89%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-16.01%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-19.87%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-68.85%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.84%

-4.50%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.34%

-44.15%

+41.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

3.10%

—

Volatility

TDAQ vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TDAQEINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

6.51%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

11.88%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.52%

15.10%

+3.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.52%

19.54%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.52%

25.43%

-6.91%

TDAQ vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDAQ has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

TDAQ vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

TDAQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.14%, more than EINC's 3.51% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		3.51%4.51%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%
TDAQ
TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF		12.14%4.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

TDAQ and EINC have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for TDAQ.

TDAQ has the higher dividend yield at 12.14%, compared with 3.51% for EINC.

TDAQ is categorized as Derivative Income, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: TappAlpha and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for TDAQ and 0.45% for EINC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDAQ and EINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer