TCV vs. MYLD
TCV (Towle Value ETF) and MYLD (Cambria Micro And Smallcap Shareholder Yield ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TCV returned 33.14% vs 41.88% for MYLD. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TCV charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MYLD.
Performance
TCV vs. MYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TCV having a 27.04% return and MYLD slightly higher at 27.32%.
TCV
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 15.50%
- YTD
- 27.04%
- 1Y
- 33.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 29.74%
MYLD
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 4.88%
- 6M
- 20.93%
- YTD
- 27.32%
- 1Y
- 41.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $140.31K | $354.47K | $191.23K | |
| $910.76K | $643.64K | $380.38K |
TCV vs. MYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TCV Towle Value ETF | 27.04% | 2.99% |
MYLD Cambria Micro And Smallcap Shareholder Yield ETF | 27.32% | 13.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCV and MYLD is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2025 | 0.75 |
The correlation between TCV and MYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCV vs. MYLD — Risk / Return Rank
TCV
MYLD
TCV vs. MYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Towle Value ETF (TCV) and Cambria Micro And Smallcap Shareholder Yield ETF (MYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TCV | MYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.42 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 4.24 | -1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.79 | 13.03 | -4.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TCV vs. MYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCV drawdown since its inception was -12.23%, smaller than the maximum MYLD drawdown of -28.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCV and MYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCV | MYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -28.23% | +16.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.13% | -9.92% | -2.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.57% | -0.20% | -2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.23% | -5.68% | +2.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 3.26% | +0.64% |
Volatility
TCV vs. MYLD - Volatility Comparison
Towle Value ETF (TCV) and Cambria Micro And Smallcap Shareholder Yield ETF (MYLD) have volatilities of 4.69% and 4.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCV | MYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.69% | 4.55% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.66% | 11.71% | +1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.70% | 17.93% | +2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 19.73% | +1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 19.73% | +1.34% |
TCV vs. MYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCV vs. MYLD - Dividend Comparison
TCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than MYLD's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MYLD Cambria Micro And Smallcap Shareholder Yield ETF | 2.07% | 6.22% | 3.26% |
TCV Towle Value ETF | 0.57% | 0.31% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TCV and MYLD have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TCV has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to MYLD (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCV dropped -12.23% vs MYLD's -28.23%.
On 1-year performance, MYLD leads with 41.88% vs 33.14% for TCV. On fees, MYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, MYLD has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MYLD has performed better with a 41.88% return vs 33.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TCV.
MYLD has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.57% for TCV.
They also come from different issuers: Towle and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TCV and 0.59% for MYLD.
MYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCV and MYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer