PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCPB vs. BCD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCPB vs. BCD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Core Plus Bond ETF (TCPB) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCPB achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than BCD's 20.45% return.


TCPB

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.36%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.31%
1Y
5.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BCD

1D
-0.16%
1M
-1.43%
YTD
20.45%
6M
20.51%
1Y
31.80%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
11.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCPB vs. BCD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TCPB and BCD is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

-0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCPB vs. BCD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCPB
TCPB Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
TCPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCPB Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TCPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCPB Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

BCD
BCD Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCD Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCD Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCPB vs. BCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Core Plus Bond ETF (TCPB) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCPBBCDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.43

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

4.42

-2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.60

12.57

-5.97

TCPB vs. BCD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCPB Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the BCD Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCPB and BCD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCPBBCDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

2.33

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.67

+0.51

Drawdowns

TCPB vs. BCD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCPB drawdown since its inception was -2.74%, smaller than the maximum BCD drawdown of -29.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCPB and BCD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCPBBCDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.74%

-29.81%

+27.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.74%

-7.22%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-3.60%

+2.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.79%

-9.86%

+9.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

2.54%

-1.63%

Volatility

TCPB vs. BCD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thrivent Core Plus Bond ETF (TCPB) is 1.36%, while abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that TCPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCPBBCDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

4.33%

-2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.65%

11.74%

-9.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.10%

13.72%

-9.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.45%

15.41%

-10.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.45%

13.90%

-9.45%

TCPB vs. BCD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCPB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BCD's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCPB vs. BCD - Dividend Comparison

TCPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, less than BCD's 14.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCD
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF
14.29%17.21%3.60%4.51%5.21%8.30%1.29%1.55%1.59%0.07%
TCPB
Thrivent Core Plus Bond ETF
4.78%3.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TCPB and BCD have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCD has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to TCPB (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCPB dropped -2.74% vs BCD's -29.81%.

On 1-year performance, BCD leads with 31.80% vs 5.97% for TCPB. On fees, BCD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, TCPB has been the lower-risk option at 1.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BCD has performed better with a 31.80% return vs 5.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BCD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for TCPB.

BCD has the higher dividend yield at 14.29%, compared with 4.78% for TCPB.

TCPB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while BCD is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Thrivent and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for TCPB and 0.29% for BCD.

BCD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCPB and BCD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer