PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCNNF vs. REFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TCNNF vs. REFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trulieve Cannabis Corp (TCNNF) and Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCNNF achieves a 7.25% return, which is significantly higher than REFI's -4.13% return.


TCNNF

1D
-1.58%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
7.25%
6M
54.56%
1Y
127.32%
3Y*
34.04%
5Y*
-24.52%
10Y*

REFI

1D
0.18%
1M
-6.08%
YTD
-4.13%
6M
-2.29%
1Y
-8.83%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCNNF vs. REFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TCNNF
Trulieve Cannabis Corp
7.25%67.65%-0.51%-31.18%-70.90%-0.91%
REFI
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
-4.13%-8.70%8.69%23.70%3.35%0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between TCNNF and REFI is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021

0.11

The correlation between TCNNF and REFI shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TCNNF:

$1.84B

REFI:

$242.34M

EPS

TCNNF:

-$0.42

REFI:

$226.63

PS Ratio

TCNNF:

1.53

REFI:

5.46

PB Ratio

TCNNF:

1.60

REFI:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

TCNNF:

$1.17B

REFI:

$44.35M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TCNNF:

$670.85M

REFI:

$42.41M

EBITDA (TTM)

TCNNF:

$276.20M

REFI:

$8.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCNNF vs. REFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCNNF
TCNNF Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
TCNNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCNNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCNNF Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
TCNNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCNNF Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

REFI
REFI Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
REFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
REFI Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
REFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
REFI Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCNNF vs. REFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trulieve Cannabis Corp (TCNNF) and Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCNNFREFIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

-0.38

+1.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.42

-0.38

+2.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.95

+0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

-0.69

+3.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.87

-1.30

+6.16

TCNNF vs. REFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCNNF Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the REFI Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCNNF and REFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCNNFREFIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

-0.38

+1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.19

-0.21

Drawdowns

TCNNF vs. REFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCNNF drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, which is greater than REFI's maximum drawdown of -26.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCNNF and REFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCNNFREFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.88%

-26.55%

-67.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.42%

-14.71%

-39.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.52%

-19.25%

-58.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.34%

-16.89%

-65.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.16%

-9.87%

-51.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.32%

7.83%

+19.49%

Volatility

TCNNF vs. REFI - Volatility Comparison

Trulieve Cannabis Corp (TCNNF) has a higher volatility of 28.20% compared to Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) at 8.00%. This indicates that TCNNF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCNNFREFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.20%

8.00%

+20.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

84.17%

16.79%

+67.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

120.44%

23.38%

+97.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

87.73%

24.31%

+63.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.80%

24.31%

+57.49%

Dividends

TCNNF vs. REFI - Dividend Comparison

TCNNF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while REFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.67%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
REFI
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
16.67%15.33%13.36%13.41%13.93%
TCNNF
Trulieve Cannabis Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TCNNF vs. REFI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trulieve Cannabis Corp and Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M20222023202420252026
286.75M
0
(TCNNF) Total Revenue
(REFI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TCNNF and REFI have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCNNF has higher volatility (28.20%) compared to REFI (8.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCNNF dropped -93.88% vs REFI's -26.55%.

TCNNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCNNF and REFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer