TCNNF vs. REFI
TCNNF (Trulieve Cannabis Corp) and REFI (Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.) are both stocks. TCNNF operates in Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic (Healthcare), while REFI operates in REIT - Mortgage (Real Estate). Over the past 3 years, TCNNF returned 34.04%/yr vs 4.70%/yr for REFI. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TCNNF vs. REFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCNNF achieves a 7.25% return, which is significantly higher than REFI's -4.13% return.
TCNNF
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- 7.25%
- 6M
- 54.56%
- 1Y
- 127.32%
- 3Y*
- 34.04%
- 5Y*
- -24.52%
- 10Y*
- —
REFI
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -6.08%
- YTD
- -4.13%
- 6M
- -2.29%
- 1Y
- -8.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TCNNF vs. REFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCNNF Trulieve Cannabis Corp | 7.25% | 67.65% | -0.51% | -31.18% | -70.90% | -0.91% |
REFI Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. | -4.13% | -8.70% | 8.69% | 23.70% | 3.35% | 0.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCNNF and REFI is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021 | 0.11 |
The correlation between TCNNF and REFI shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TCNNF:
$1.84B
REFI:
$242.34M
TCNNF:
-$0.42
REFI:
$226.63
TCNNF:
1.53
REFI:
5.46
TCNNF:
1.60
REFI:
0.00
TCNNF:
$1.17B
REFI:
$44.35M
TCNNF:
$670.85M
REFI:
$42.41M
TCNNF:
$276.20M
REFI:
$8.16M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCNNF vs. REFI — Risk / Return Rank
TCNNF
REFI
TCNNF vs. REFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trulieve Cannabis Corp (TCNNF) and Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TCNNF | REFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | -0.38 | +1.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.42 | -0.38 | +2.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.95 | +0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | -0.69 | +3.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.87 | -1.30 | +6.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TCNNF | REFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | -0.38 | +1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.19 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
TCNNF vs. REFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCNNF drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, which is greater than REFI's maximum drawdown of -26.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCNNF and REFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCNNF | REFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.88% | -26.55% | -67.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.42% | -14.71% | -39.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.52% | -19.25% | -58.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.34% | -16.89% | -65.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.16% | -9.87% | -51.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.32% | 7.83% | +19.49% |
Volatility
TCNNF vs. REFI - Volatility Comparison
Trulieve Cannabis Corp (TCNNF) has a higher volatility of 28.20% compared to Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) at 8.00%. This indicates that TCNNF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCNNF | REFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.20% | 8.00% | +20.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 84.17% | 16.79% | +67.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 120.44% | 23.38% | +97.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.73% | 24.31% | +63.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.80% | 24.31% | +57.49% |
Dividends
TCNNF vs. REFI - Dividend Comparison
TCNNF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while REFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REFI Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. | 16.67% | 15.33% | 13.36% | 13.41% | 13.93% |
TCNNF Trulieve Cannabis Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TCNNF vs. REFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trulieve Cannabis Corp and Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TCNNF and REFI have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TCNNF has higher volatility (28.20%) compared to REFI (8.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCNNF dropped -93.88% vs REFI's -26.55%.
TCNNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCNNF and REFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer