TCMSX vs. UMBHX
TCMSX (Voya Small Cap Growth Fund) and UMBHX (Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TCMSX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for UMBHX.
Performance
TCMSX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TCMSX
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 6.11%
- YTD
- 18.13%
- 6M
- 17.07%
- 1Y
- 46.45%
- 3Y*
- 21.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.32%
- 10Y*
- 14.85%
UMBHX
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TCMSX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TCMSX Voya Small Cap Growth Fund | -0.45% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCMSX and UMBHX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCMSX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank
TCMSX
UMBHX
TCMSX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Small Cap Growth Fund (TCMSX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TCMSX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.42 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.11 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.89 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TCMSX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 1.79 | -1.30 |
Drawdowns
TCMSX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCMSX drawdown since its inception was -55.98%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCMSX and UMBHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCMSX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.98% | -1.86% | -54.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | 0.00% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.77% | -0.84% | -10.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | — | — |
Volatility
TCMSX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCMSX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.99% | 30.30% | -7.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 30.30% | -5.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.64% | 30.30% | -6.66% |
TCMSX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCMSX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCMSX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison
TCMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, while UMBHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCMSX Voya Small Cap Growth Fund | 4.72% | 5.57% | 10.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.02% | 6.69% | 1.40% | 14.82% | 16.10% | 0.00% | 16.82% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, TCMSX and UMBHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for TCMSX and UMBHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer