PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCMSX vs. IISNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCMSX vs. IISNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Small Cap Growth Fund (TCMSX) and Voya Index Solution 2055 Portfolio (IISNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCMSX achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly higher than IISNX's 10.97% return. Over the past 10 years, TCMSX has outperformed IISNX with an annualized return of 14.04%, while IISNX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.38% annualized return.


TCMSX

1D
2.56%
1M
-6.37%
6M
7.91%
YTD
14.56%
1Y
33.33%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
8.38%
10Y*
14.04%
ALL TIME*
11.11%

IISNX

1D
1.97%
1M
-0.12%
6M
6.93%
YTD
10.97%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
16.88%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
11.38%
ALL TIME*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TCMSX vs. IISNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TCMSX
Voya Small Cap Growth Fund
14.56%14.32%18.46%20.32%-23.60%18.45%27.99%33.27%-6.04%24.78%
IISNX
Voya Index Solution 2055 Portfolio
10.97%20.72%15.38%20.31%-18.25%17.99%15.46%25.17%-8.47%21.04%

Correlation

The correlation between TCMSX and IISNX is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2010

0.84

The correlation between TCMSX and IISNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCMSX vs. IISNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TCMSX
TCMSX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
TCMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
TCMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

IISNX
IISNX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IISNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IISNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IISNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IISNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IISNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TCMSX vs. IISNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Small Cap Growth Fund (TCMSX) and Voya Index Solution 2055 Portfolio (IISNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TCMSXIISNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.31

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

2.40

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.18

10.86

-3.68

TCMSX vs. IISNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the IISNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCMSX and IISNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TCMSX vs. IISNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCMSX drawdown since its inception was -55.98%, which is greater than IISNX's maximum drawdown of -32.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCMSX and IISNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCMSXIISNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.98%

-32.62%

-23.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.86%

-9.38%

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.74%

-15.82%

-14.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.60%

-25.85%

-8.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.29%

-32.62%

-6.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.45%

-1.26%

-8.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.71%

-4.61%

-7.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.60%

2.01%

+2.59%

Volatility

TCMSX vs. IISNX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Small Cap Growth Fund (TCMSX) has a higher volatility of 5.90% compared to Voya Index Solution 2055 Portfolio (IISNX) at 3.77%. This indicates that TCMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IISNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCMSXIISNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.90%

3.77%

+2.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.21%

10.76%

+8.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.38%

13.40%

+10.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.61%

15.42%

+9.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.73%

16.17%

+7.56%

TCMSX vs. IISNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCMSX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than IISNX's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCMSX vs. IISNX - Dividend Comparison

TCMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, more than IISNX's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IISNX
Voya Index Solution 2055 Portfolio
1.48%1.64%0.18%8.19%14.20%4.63%4.33%4.96%3.86%3.26%8.60%10.27%
TCMSX
Voya Small Cap Growth Fund
4.86%5.57%10.53%0.00%0.00%20.02%6.69%1.40%14.82%16.10%0.00%16.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


TCMSX and IISNX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCMSX has higher volatility (5.90%) compared to IISNX (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCMSX dropped -55.98% vs IISNX's -32.62%.

IISNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCMSX and IISNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer