PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCMSX vs. IFTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCMSX vs. IFTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Small Cap Growth Fund (TCMSX) and Voya International High Dividend Low Volatility Portfolio (IFTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCMSX achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly lower than IFTIX's 15.40% return. Over the past 10 years, TCMSX has outperformed IFTIX with an annualized return of 14.04%, while IFTIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.65% annualized return.


TCMSX

1D
2.56%
1M
-6.37%
6M
7.91%
YTD
14.56%
1Y
33.33%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
8.38%
10Y*
14.04%
ALL TIME*
11.11%

IFTIX

1D
1.56%
1M
5.94%
6M
10.86%
YTD
15.40%
1Y
27.14%
3Y*
20.70%
5Y*
12.65%
10Y*
9.65%
ALL TIME*
6.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TCMSX vs. IFTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TCMSX
Voya Small Cap Growth Fund
14.56%14.32%18.46%20.32%-23.60%18.45%27.99%33.27%-6.04%24.78%
IFTIX
Voya International High Dividend Low Volatility Portfolio
15.40%37.73%7.31%14.73%-8.89%12.10%-0.52%16.67%-14.95%22.34%

Correlation

The correlation between TCMSX and IFTIX is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between TCMSX and IFTIX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCMSX vs. IFTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TCMSX
TCMSX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
TCMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
TCMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

IFTIX
IFTIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IFTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
IFTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TCMSX vs. IFTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Small Cap Growth Fund (TCMSX) and Voya International High Dividend Low Volatility Portfolio (IFTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TCMSXIFTIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.45

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

3.45

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.18

11.19

-4.01

TCMSX vs. IFTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the IFTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCMSX and IFTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TCMSX vs. IFTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCMSX drawdown since its inception was -55.98%, roughly equal to the maximum IFTIX drawdown of -57.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCMSX and IFTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCMSXIFTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.98%

-57.91%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.86%

-8.44%

-8.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.74%

-10.20%

-20.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.60%

-25.56%

-9.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.29%

-37.08%

-2.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.45%

0.00%

-9.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.71%

-11.47%

-0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.60%

2.53%

+2.07%

Volatility

TCMSX vs. IFTIX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Small Cap Growth Fund (TCMSX) has a higher volatility of 5.90% compared to Voya International High Dividend Low Volatility Portfolio (IFTIX) at 3.39%. This indicates that TCMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCMSXIFTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.90%

3.39%

+2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.21%

9.67%

+9.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.38%

12.14%

+12.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.61%

13.47%

+11.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.73%

14.41%

+9.32%

TCMSX vs. IFTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCMSX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than IFTIX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCMSX vs. IFTIX - Dividend Comparison

TCMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, less than IFTIX's 40.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IFTIX
Voya International High Dividend Low Volatility Portfolio
40.11%5.45%4.88%4.42%4.87%2.41%17.71%10.80%2.45%1.89%3.45%4.29%
TCMSX
Voya Small Cap Growth Fund
4.86%5.57%10.53%0.00%0.00%20.02%6.69%1.40%14.82%16.10%0.00%16.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


TCMSX and IFTIX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCMSX has higher volatility (5.90%) compared to IFTIX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCMSX dropped -55.98% vs IFTIX's -57.91%.

IFTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCMSX and IFTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer