TCMSX vs. ETEGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Voya Small Cap Growth Fund (TCMSX) and Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX).
TCMSX is managed by TCM Funds. It was launched on Oct 1, 2004. ETEGX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Jan 2, 1997.
Performance
TCMSX vs. ETEGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TCMSX vs. ETEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCMSX Voya Small Cap Growth Fund | -7.95% | 14.32% | 18.46% | 20.32% | -23.60% | 18.45% | 27.99% | 33.27% | -6.04% | 24.78% |
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund | -4.42% | -6.20% | 14.65% | 11.28% | -15.52% | 21.45% | 12.73% | 27.57% | -6.00% | 14.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCMSX achieves a -7.95% return, which is significantly lower than ETEGX's -4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, TCMSX has outperformed ETEGX with an annualized return of 12.47%, while ETEGX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.90% annualized return.
TCMSX
- 1D
- -2.51%
- 1M
- -12.47%
- YTD
- -7.95%
- 6M
- -3.62%
- 1Y
- 18.47%
- 3Y*
- 12.07%
- 5Y*
- 4.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.47%
ETEGX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -9.24%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -6.71%
- 1Y
- -6.33%
- 3Y*
- 2.41%
- 5Y*
- 1.35%
- 10Y*
- 7.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TCMSX vs. ETEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCMSX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than ETEGX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TCMSX vs. ETEGX — Risk / Return Rank
TCMSX
ETEGX
TCMSX vs. ETEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Small Cap Growth Fund (TCMSX) and Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TCMSX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | -0.31 | +0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.05 | -0.33 | +1.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.96 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | -0.58 | +0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.40 | -1.39 | +1.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TCMSX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | -0.31 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.07 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.40 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.27 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between TCMSX and ETEGX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TCMSX vs. ETEGX - Dividend Comparison
TCMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.05%, less than ETEGX's 8.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCMSX Voya Small Cap Growth Fund | 6.05% | 5.57% | 10.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.02% | 6.69% | 1.40% | 14.82% | 16.10% | 0.00% | 16.82% |
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund | 8.61% | 8.23% | 5.13% | 0.68% | 3.22% | 13.87% | 1.06% | 7.19% | 12.29% | 11.02% | 13.88% | 23.25% |
Drawdowns
TCMSX vs. ETEGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCMSX drawdown since its inception was -55.98%, smaller than the maximum ETEGX drawdown of -67.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCMSX and ETEGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCMSX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.98% | -67.58% | +11.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.86% | -13.05% | -3.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.60% | -24.30% | -10.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.29% | -36.66% | -2.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.86% | -15.60% | -1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.84% | -22.84% | +11.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.44% | 5.43% | +3.01% |
Volatility
TCMSX vs. ETEGX - Volatility Comparison
Voya Small Cap Growth Fund (TCMSX) has a higher volatility of 8.89% compared to Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) at 4.80%. This indicates that TCMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TCMSX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.89% | 4.80% | +4.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.86% | 10.97% | +5.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.47% | 19.66% | +8.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.06% | 18.73% | +5.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.42% | 19.81% | +3.61% |