TCLRX vs. LTIUX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2035 Fund (TCLRX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX).
TCLRX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Oct 14, 2004. LTIUX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Feb 28, 2008.
Performance
TCLRX vs. LTIUX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TCLRX vs. LTIUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCLRX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2035 Fund | -3.75% | 15.07% | 11.00% | 16.13% | -16.19% | 12.38% | 15.07% | 22.77% | -8.30% | 18.45% |
LTIUX Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund | -3.69% | 14.26% | 14.13% | 16.51% | -17.48% | 14.07% | 15.70% | 23.48% | -7.37% | 19.69% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TCLRX having a -3.75% return and LTIUX slightly higher at -3.69%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TCLRX having a 8.28% annualized return and LTIUX not far ahead at 8.68%.
TCLRX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -6.63%
- YTD
- -3.75%
- 6M
- -1.53%
- 1Y
- 11.37%
- 3Y*
- 10.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.42%
- 10Y*
- 8.28%
LTIUX
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -6.37%
- YTD
- -3.69%
- 6M
- -1.87%
- 1Y
- 9.88%
- 3Y*
- 11.62%
- 5Y*
- 5.83%
- 10Y*
- 8.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TCLRX vs. LTIUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCLRX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LTIUX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TCLRX vs. LTIUX — Risk / Return Rank
TCLRX
LTIUX
TCLRX vs. LTIUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2035 Fund (TCLRX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TCLRX | LTIUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.05 | 0.90 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 1.34 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.19 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 1.06 | +0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.54 | 5.01 | +0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TCLRX | LTIUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 0.90 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.50 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.70 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.45 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between TCLRX and LTIUX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TCLRX vs. LTIUX - Dividend Comparison
TCLRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, less than LTIUX's 9.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCLRX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2035 Fund | 5.04% | 4.85% | 2.74% | 1.61% | 5.83% | 7.91% | 5.16% | 3.80% | 6.54% | 2.60% | 5.11% | 5.35% |
LTIUX Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund | 9.37% | 9.03% | 9.46% | 4.17% | 7.50% | 7.06% | 5.35% | 7.28% | 7.75% | 5.46% | 4.28% | 5.59% |
Drawdowns
TCLRX vs. LTIUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCLRX drawdown since its inception was -53.91%, which is greater than LTIUX's maximum drawdown of -49.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCLRX and LTIUX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCLRX | LTIUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.91% | -49.65% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.92% | -8.44% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.09% | -24.23% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.96% | -28.12% | +0.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.98% | -6.57% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.46% | -6.76% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 1.78% | +0.07% |
Volatility
TCLRX vs. LTIUX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2035 Fund (TCLRX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX) have volatilities of 3.57% and 3.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TCLRX | LTIUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 3.74% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.38% | 6.37% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.02% | 11.12% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.16% | 11.79% | -0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.59% | 12.45% | +0.14% |