PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCLIX vs. TIGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCLIX vs. TIGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2015 Fund (TCLIX) and TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund (TIGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCLIX achieves a 3.80% return, which is significantly lower than TIGRX's 4.86% return. Over the past 10 years, TCLIX has underperformed TIGRX with an annualized return of 5.96%, while TIGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.08% annualized return.


TCLIX

1D
0.89%
1M
-0.36%
6M
2.55%
YTD
3.80%
1Y
9.42%
3Y*
8.61%
5Y*
3.93%
10Y*
5.96%
ALL TIME*
5.50%

TIGRX

1D
1.68%
1M
-0.94%
6M
4.17%
YTD
4.86%
1Y
13.99%
3Y*
17.54%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*
14.08%
ALL TIME*
8.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TCLIX vs. TIGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TCLIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2015 Fund
3.80%11.50%7.52%10.90%-13.12%7.40%11.57%16.28%-4.78%11.29%
TIGRX
TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund
4.86%13.92%29.01%32.97%-22.15%25.55%20.49%30.29%-7.33%23.72%

Correlation

The correlation between TCLIX and TIGRX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2004

0.92

The correlation between TCLIX and TIGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCLIX vs. TIGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TCLIX
TCLIX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TCLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TCLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

TIGRX
TIGRX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
TIGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
TIGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TCLIX vs. TIGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2015 Fund (TCLIX) and TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund (TIGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TCLIXTIGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.16

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

1.10

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.46

4.25

+4.21

TCLIX vs. TIGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCLIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the TIGRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCLIX and TIGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TCLIX vs. TIGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCLIX drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, smaller than the maximum TIGRX drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCLIX and TIGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCLIXTIGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.84%

-49.52%

+9.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.60%

-11.27%

+6.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.10%

-20.79%

+14.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.04%

-27.16%

+9.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.73%

-35.56%

+16.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-3.36%

+2.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-11.13%

+6.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

2.90%

-1.82%

Volatility

TCLIX vs. TIGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2015 Fund (TCLIX) is 1.72%, while TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund (TIGRX) has a volatility of 3.68%. This indicates that TCLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCLIXTIGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

3.68%

-1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.87%

11.35%

-6.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.81%

14.34%

-8.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.02%

22.67%

-15.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.44%

21.37%

-13.93%

TCLIX vs. TIGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCLIX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than TIGRX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCLIX vs. TIGRX - Dividend Comparison

TCLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, less than TIGRX's 13.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TCLIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2015 Fund
4.03%4.19%3.02%2.59%5.45%7.41%4.72%3.32%6.45%2.66%5.08%5.19%
TIGRX
TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund
13.24%14.09%11.70%24.27%9.52%19.80%7.44%6.61%9.98%4.60%3.06%8.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


TCLIX and TIGRX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIGRX has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to TCLIX (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCLIX dropped -39.84% vs TIGRX's -49.52%.

TCLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCLIX and TIGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer