TCLIX vs. FRQIX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

TCLIX (TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2015 Fund) and FRQIX (Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, TCLIX returned 6.19%/yr vs 4.92%/yr for FRQIX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TCLIX charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for FRQIX.

Performance

TCLIX vs. FRQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2015 Fund (TCLIX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCLIX achieves a 4.26% return, which is significantly higher than FRQIX's 3.87% return. Over the past 10 years, TCLIX has outperformed FRQIX with an annualized return of 6.19%, while FRQIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.92% annualized return.

TCLIX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 4.26%
• 6M: 4.67%
• 1Y: 12.40%
• 3Y*: 9.84%
• 5Y*: 4.29%
• 10Y*: 6.19%

FRQIX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 3.87%
• 6M: 4.23%
• 1Y: 9.89%
• 3Y*: 7.66%
• 5Y*: 2.79%
• 10Y*: 4.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCLIX vs. FRQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TCLIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2015 Fund	4.26%	11.50%	7.52%	10.90%	-13.12%	7.40%	11.57%	16.28%	-4.78%	11.29%
FRQIX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I	3.87%	9.97%	4.48%	8.52%	-12.39%	3.82%	9.58%	12.63%	-2.84%	10.64%

Correlation

The correlation between TCLIX and FRQIX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007	0.95

The correlation between TCLIX and FRQIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TCLIX vs. FRQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCLIX

TCLIX Risk / Return Rank: 65
TCLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
TCLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
TCLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
TCLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
TCLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

FRQIX

FRQIX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FRQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FRQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
FRQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FRQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FRQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCLIX vs. FRQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2015 Fund (TCLIX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TCLIX	FRQIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	2.37	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.44	3.48	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.47	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	2.86	-0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.86	12.19	-0.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TCLIX vs. FRQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCLIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the FRQIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCLIX and FRQIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TCLIX	FRQIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	2.37	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	0.50	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	0.93	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.56	0.00

Drawdowns

TCLIX vs. FRQIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCLIX drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, roughly equal to the maximum FRQIX drawdown of -38.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCLIX and FRQIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TCLIX	FRQIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.84%	-38.01%	-1.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.60%	-3.43%	-1.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.10%	-5.21%	-0.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.04%	-17.04%	-1.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.73%	-17.04%	-1.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-0.17%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.53%	-4.43%	-0.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.04%	0.80%	+0.24%

Volatility

TCLIX vs. FRQIX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2015 Fund (TCLIX) has a higher volatility of 1.75% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) at 1.65%. This indicates that TCLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TCLIX	FRQIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.75%	1.65%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.28%	3.41%	+0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.33%	4.16%	+1.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.95%	5.56%	+1.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.48%	5.33%	+2.15%

TCLIX vs. FRQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCLIX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQIX's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

TCLIX vs. FRQIX - Dividend Comparison

TCLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than FRQIX's 3.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRQIX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I	3.04%	3.14%	2.97%	2.75%	5.01%	6.00%	3.51%	3.14%	5.60%	16.32%	2.43%	4.08%
TCLIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2015 Fund	4.02%	4.19%	3.02%	2.59%	5.45%	7.41%	4.72%	3.32%	6.45%	2.66%	5.08%	5.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TCLIX and FRQIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, TCLIX and FRQIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TCLIX or FRQIX?

TCLIX has higher volatility (1.75%) compared to FRQIX (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCLIX dropped -39.84% vs FRQIX's -38.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.