TCLFX vs. JLKYX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2025 Fund (TCLFX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX).
TCLFX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Oct 14, 2004. JLKYX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Mar 25, 2014.
Performance
TCLFX vs. JLKYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TCLFX vs. JLKYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCLFX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2025 Fund | -1.38% | 12.77% | 8.81% | 12.83% | -14.54% | 9.44% | 13.22% | 19.21% | -6.41% | 14.74% |
JLKYX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio | -1.36% | 20.04% | 15.41% | 18.53% | -18.04% | 18.38% | 16.13% | 25.07% | -8.32% | 17.29% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TCLFX having a -1.38% return and JLKYX slightly higher at -1.36%. Over the past 10 years, TCLFX has underperformed JLKYX with an annualized return of 6.98%, while JLKYX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.33% annualized return.
TCLFX
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- -3.41%
- YTD
- -1.38%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- 10.67%
- 3Y*
- 9.37%
- 5Y*
- 4.41%
- 10Y*
- 6.98%
JLKYX
- 1D
- 2.78%
- 1M
- -5.68%
- YTD
- -1.36%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- 19.55%
- 3Y*
- 15.25%
- 5Y*
- 8.08%
- 10Y*
- 10.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TCLFX vs. JLKYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCLFX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than JLKYX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TCLFX vs. JLKYX — Risk / Return Rank
TCLFX
JLKYX
TCLFX vs. JLKYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2025 Fund (TCLFX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TCLFX | JLKYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 1.22 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.91 | 1.78 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.26 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 1.74 | +0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.28 | 8.09 | -0.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TCLFX | JLKYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 1.22 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.54 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.64 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.58 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between TCLFX and JLKYX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TCLFX vs. JLKYX - Dividend Comparison
TCLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than JLKYX's 3.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCLFX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2025 Fund | 4.88% | 4.81% | 3.42% | 2.14% | 5.63% | 7.38% | 4.75% | 3.53% | 6.46% | 2.33% | 5.05% | 4.79% |
JLKYX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio | 3.66% | 3.61% | 1.77% | 2.16% | 8.08% | 5.71% | 3.88% | 8.54% | 10.69% | 4.33% | 3.23% | 1.75% |
Drawdowns
TCLFX vs. JLKYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCLFX drawdown since its inception was -48.12%, which is greater than JLKYX's maximum drawdown of -32.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCLFX and JLKYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCLFX | JLKYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.12% | -32.55% | -15.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.96% | -11.59% | +5.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.28% | -25.75% | +5.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.98% | -32.55% | +9.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.09% | -6.63% | +2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.02% | -4.71% | -1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | 2.49% | -1.06% |
Volatility
TCLFX vs. JLKYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2025 Fund (TCLFX) is 3.23%, while John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) has a volatility of 5.95%. This indicates that TCLFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JLKYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TCLFX | JLKYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.23% | 5.95% | -2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.98% | 9.49% | -4.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.19% | 16.39% | -8.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.54% | 15.16% | -6.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.61% | 16.16% | -6.55% |