TCLFX vs. FRQIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TCLFX (TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2025 Fund) and FRQIX (Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, TCLFX returned 7.47%/yr vs 4.98%/yr for FRQIX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TCLFX charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for FRQIX.

Performance

TCLFX vs. FRQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2025 Fund (TCLFX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCLFX achieves a 5.46% return, which is significantly higher than FRQIX's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, TCLFX has outperformed FRQIX with an annualized return of 7.47%, while FRQIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.98% annualized return.

TCLFX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 2.49%
• YTD: 5.46%
• 6M: 5.83%
• 1Y: 14.95%
• 3Y*: 11.38%
• 5Y*: 5.22%
• 10Y*: 7.47%

FRQIX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.53%
• YTD: 4.05%
• 6M: 4.28%
• 1Y: 10.42%
• 3Y*: 7.71%
• 5Y*: 2.92%
• 10Y*: 4.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCLFX vs. FRQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TCLFX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2025 Fund	5.46%	12.77%	8.81%	12.83%	-14.54%	9.44%	13.22%	19.21%	-6.41%	14.74%
FRQIX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I	4.05%	9.97%	4.48%	8.52%	-12.39%	3.82%	9.58%	12.63%	-2.84%	10.64%

Correlation

The correlation between TCLFX and FRQIX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007	0.94

The correlation between TCLFX and FRQIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TCLFX vs. FRQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCLFX

TCLFX Risk / Return Rank: 62
TCLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
TCLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
TCLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
TCLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
TCLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

FRQIX

FRQIX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FRQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FRQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FRQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FRQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FRQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCLFX vs. FRQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2025 Fund (TCLFX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TCLFX	FRQIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	2.53	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	3.73	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.51	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	3.07	-0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.22	13.08	-0.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TCLFX vs. FRQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCLFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the FRQIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCLFX and FRQIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TCLFX	FRQIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	2.53	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.53	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	0.94	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.56	-0.07

Drawdowns

TCLFX vs. FRQIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCLFX drawdown since its inception was -48.12%, which is greater than FRQIX's maximum drawdown of -38.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCLFX and FRQIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TCLFX	FRQIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.12%	-38.01%	-10.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.50%	-3.43%	-2.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.03%	-5.21%	-2.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.28%	-17.04%	-3.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.98%	-17.04%	-5.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.98%	-4.43%	-1.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.24%	0.80%	+0.44%

Volatility

TCLFX vs. FRQIX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2025 Fund (TCLFX) has a higher volatility of 2.08% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) at 1.66%. This indicates that TCLFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TCLFX	FRQIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.08%	1.66%	+0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.24%	3.42%	+1.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.50%	4.15%	+2.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.55%	5.57%	+2.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.62%	5.33%	+4.29%

TCLFX vs. FRQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCLFX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQIX's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

TCLFX vs. FRQIX - Dividend Comparison

TCLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than FRQIX's 3.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRQIX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I	3.04%	3.14%	2.97%	2.75%	5.01%	6.00%	3.51%	3.14%	5.60%	16.32%	2.43%	4.08%
TCLFX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2025 Fund	4.56%	4.81%	3.42%	2.14%	5.63%	7.38%	4.75%	3.53%	6.46%	2.33%	5.05%	4.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TCLFX and FRQIX in my portfolio?

TCLFX and FRQIX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TCLFX or FRQIX?

TCLFX has higher volatility (2.08%) compared to FRQIX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCLFX dropped -48.12% vs FRQIX's -38.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.