TCLEX vs. FFSZX
TCLEX (TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund) and FFSZX (Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, TCLEX returned 4.21%/yr vs 10.48%/yr for FFSZX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TCLEX charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FFSZX.
Performance
TCLEX vs. FFSZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCLEX achieves a 4.09% return, which is significantly lower than FFSZX's 13.30% return.
TCLEX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 4.09%
- 6M
- 4.61%
- 1Y
- 12.24%
- 3Y*
- 9.56%
- 5Y*
- 4.21%
- 10Y*
- 5.87%
FFSZX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 4.13%
- YTD
- 13.30%
- 6M
- 15.66%
- 1Y
- 31.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.48%
- 10Y*
- —
TCLEX vs. FFSZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCLEX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund | 4.09% | 11.22% | 7.31% | 10.64% | -12.64% | 6.62% | 10.95% | 4.59% |
FFSZX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 | 13.30% | 24.08% | 14.41% | 20.78% | -18.05% | 16.81% | 18.36% | 9.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCLEX and FFSZX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019 | 0.92 |
The correlation between TCLEX and FFSZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCLEX vs. FFSZX — Risk / Return Rank
TCLEX
FFSZX
TCLEX vs. FFSZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund (TCLEX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TCLEX | FFSZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.47 | 2.51 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.66 | 3.45 | +0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.47 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 3.24 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.38 | 14.53 | -1.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TCLEX | FFSZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 2.51 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.70 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.80 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
TCLEX vs. FFSZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCLEX drawdown since its inception was -35.33%, which is greater than FFSZX's maximum drawdown of -31.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCLEX and FFSZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCLEX | FFSZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.33% | -31.00% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.28% | -9.77% | +5.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.25% | -15.36% | +7.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.31% | -27.17% | +9.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -5.81% | +1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 2.18% | -1.22% |
Volatility
TCLEX vs. FFSZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund (TCLEX) is 1.67%, while Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that TCLEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFSZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCLEX | FFSZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.67% | 4.27% | -2.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.10% | 10.54% | -6.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.07% | 12.77% | -7.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.90% | 15.01% | -8.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.00% | 17.06% | -10.06% |
TCLEX vs. FFSZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCLEX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than FFSZX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCLEX vs. FFSZX - Dividend Comparison
TCLEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than FFSZX's 5.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFSZX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 | 5.05% | 3.82% | 2.92% | 2.26% | 8.99% | 7.98% | 2.41% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TCLEX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund | 5.12% | 5.33% | 4.44% | 2.95% | 5.91% | 8.53% | 6.93% | 3.95% | 5.60% | 1.72% | 3.45% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, TCLEX and FFSZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FFSZX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to TCLEX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCLEX dropped -35.33% vs FFSZX's -31.00%.
FFSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCLEX and FFSZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer