TCI vs. NMRK
Compare and contrast key facts about Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. (TCI) and Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK).
Performance
TCI vs. NMRK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TCI vs. NMRK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCI Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. | -40.84% | 96.65% | -13.74% | -21.77% | 12.99% | 62.17% | -39.54% | 40.82% | -9.58% | -7.86% |
NMRK Newmark Group, Inc. | -13.94% | 36.47% | 18.06% | 39.87% | -56.96% | 157.32% | -44.91% | 74.73% | -48.39% | 13.98% |
Fundamentals
TCI:
$299.61M
NMRK:
$3.79B
TCI:
$1.60
NMRK:
$0.12
TCI:
21.71
NMRK:
129.11
TCI:
0.02
NMRK:
70.41
TCI:
6.11
NMRK:
1.15
TCI:
0.35
NMRK:
2.16
TCI:
$49.06M
NMRK:
$3.29B
TCI:
$0.00
NMRK:
$2.29B
TCI:
$12.65M
NMRK:
$289.22M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCI achieves a -40.84% return, which is significantly lower than NMRK's -13.94% return.
TCI
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -3.85%
- YTD
- -40.84%
- 6M
- -24.82%
- 1Y
- 24.08%
- 3Y*
- -6.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 13.34%
NMRK
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- -13.94%
- 6M
- -19.15%
- 1Y
- 23.97%
- 3Y*
- 29.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCI vs. NMRK — Risk / Return Rank
TCI
NMRK
TCI vs. NMRK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. (TCI) and Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TCI | NMRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.47 | 0.59 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.99 | 1.03 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.14 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 0.80 | -0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.67 | 1.83 | -0.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TCI | NMRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 0.59 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.19 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.04 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between TCI and NMRK is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TCI vs. NMRK - Dividend Comparison
TCI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NMRK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCI Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NMRK Newmark Group, Inc. | 0.81% | 0.69% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 1.25% | 0.21% | 1.78% | 2.90% | 3.37% |
Drawdowns
TCI vs. NMRK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCI drawdown since its inception was -92.97%, which is greater than NMRK's maximum drawdown of -83.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCI and NMRK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCI | NMRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.97% | -83.84% | -9.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.81% | -29.08% | -14.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.36% | -71.92% | +26.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.13% | -23.65% | -17.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.86% | -36.05% | +4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.43% | 12.77% | +1.66% |
Volatility
TCI vs. NMRK - Volatility Comparison
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. (TCI) has a higher volatility of 19.04% compared to Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) at 10.20%. This indicates that TCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TCI | NMRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.04% | 10.20% | +8.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.47% | 28.94% | +11.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.58% | 40.90% | +10.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.37% | 42.75% | -1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.04% | 57.37% | -4.33% |
Financials
TCI vs. NMRK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. and Newmark Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities